Posted on 05/12/2011 10:13:23 AM PDT by nikos1121
Dear Mr. Trump:
A few weeks ago you made a sincere request of our president to release the long form of his birth certificate. You were ridiculed by many of your close friends and the media, but you stuck to your guns like a true American who knows he is right and won the respect of many people on this forum and throughout the country.
Miraculously the president posted a long form birth certificate on the governments web page for all to see, and you went before the media, graciously congratulated him on his new found candor and transparency. You said that you hoped it was an authenticate document, and that you planned to examine it.
I ask you now. Have you had the opportunity to examine the document? If so, what were your findings? Is it authentic or not?
If you have not had the opportunity to examine it, or if you have now decided under public pressure and threat of further ridicule to drop the subject, let me take this opportunity to assist you and to offer up some advice.
You should know that within hours of its release, many so called photo shop experts declared the document to be a forgery but not a complex forgery that required hours of diligent work to produce and hours more to analyze but an obvious forgery that was carelessly produced and easy to uncover using Adobe Illustrator Software.
Perhaps you already know that many of these experts have posted their findings in a clear and systematic form where anyone, with a modicum of intelligence, can easily understand.
I draw your attention to the work of one who posts on YouTube under the name of orangegold1, but a simple search will list many more. In fact, I am sure that you have people in your employ who are fully capable of explaining how the document was altered.
If you havent as yet done so, I urge you to watch some of these YouTube postings and to have them also looked at by those people around you whose opinion you respect. Collectively if you agree that the Obama long form birth certificate is an obvious fake, then I strongly recommend that you bring together a small group of these experts before the media and have them clearly explain to the American public why they believe as they do.
I recommend that you then ask President Obama and his administration to explain where these experts are wrong, and more importantly, ask him why he did this? Why would he release a document that is so blatantly a forgery? Was it by his arrogance or by his ignorance?
Mr. Trump, you had your opponent on his one yard line, and you were about to tackle him for a safety in a one point game, but for some reason youve decided to take your team off the field with the clock running.
Why? Because he roasted you before the media? Why? Because youre scared of losing viewers of your show? Why? When you are so close to winning? Please tell us why?
Five minutes with emacs:
showed me that the layers are arbitrary junk, not careful forgery requiring hours of work to analyze. The arbitrary junk comes from the fact that the layers were separated with thresholding with darker text in one layer and lighter in another. That's why R in BARACK is in one layer and "BA ACK" in another. Simple explanation for the separation is that someone separated it. Whether the original was a forgery or fraudulently created in Hawaii or legitimately released in Hawaii is unknown, but the layers are not evidence of anything other than post processing.
The best explanation of why someone would post process is a "rope a dope" exercise. Donald Trump will now look like a dope since real reporters have held and touched the original paper artifact that was the source of the WH PDF with the layers. Granted the one reporter I know about is a ditz who did not look carefully at the raised seal and took a low quality snap (probably with her cell phone). But again that fits the theory that the WH is trying to make the birthers look like they are stupidly ignoring reality. And so far they are succeeding to an extent.
So you’re saying that the govt posted BC was altered to look like it’s a forgery, and the real BC that OBAMA showed us is not the same BC.
I think the D was on a BC. It was an actual signed letter. The forger then added the rest of the name using adobe.
I think the Adobe Illustrator software shows how the document was constructed.
You still have not answered my question. Why would Obama release a BC, post it online that has obviously been altered?
It wasn’t altered, just processed. Their idea was to take the scan of the paper brought from HI, feed it into something like Illustrator, do some thresholding, make some layers, save as PDF, post on the web. Then let the tin foil brigade have at it. So far it seems to be working ok.
Sorry!
No! I did not know this was “Satire”..... I checked on Post & Email & I believed it was real..... This has been reposted on Post & Email 3 times now
The Secretary of the newspaper said it was not true; but, there is nothing from High Tech High “denying” article..... The name of the Commencement person seems to be factual..... This could be a libel suite if this article was fabricated.
I am not sure this was a fabrication!!
Many people have posted on youtube videos saying this document is a fake!!
“Trump and Corsi do communicate with one another”
How do you know that? I hope you’re right, but just wondering.
“Either Obama is so arrogant, thinking that he is untouchable on this subject or the person or persons who forged the BC did so in such a fashion to out him.”
Or there’s a third theory. I believe everything BHO does (or is done on his behalf) is thoroughly calculated. It could be he intentionally released such an amateurish forgery just to dare anyone to pursue it and incur widespread ridicule. At best, it would engender public sympathy for him as victim; at worst, it could start a race war or civil war. Straight out of the global leftists’ playbook - create a crisis. Think of it - an excuse for him to declare a national emergency, call out the national guard (or worse - UN?), have “enemies of the state” arrested and, ultimately, call off the ‘12 election.
Sounds crazy, maybe, but I put nothing past this scoundrel. We’re seeing things happen in this country that would’ve been unthinkable in our lifetime prior to 2008.
“I have had it examined by some experts.
I think we’re making a big assumption here, that BHO & co. has allowed ANYONE to examine it, much less let it out of their sight.
Evidence to the contrary?
Anyone who continues to maintain that the offered Obama long form BC is authentic ought to have his head examined. There are dozens of indicators pointing to forgery. For goodness sake, it doesn't even have a copy of the embossed official state seal on it and the rubber stamp that was used has a spelling error in it.
Anyone who continues to maintain that the offered Obama long form BC is authentic ought to have his head examined. There are dozens of indicators pointing to forgery. For goodness sake, it doesn't even have a copy of the embossed official state seal on it and the rubber stamp that was used has a spelling error in it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.