Do you know the scientific definition for the word "theory" without looking it up? I doubt it. You're the one who is spouting Karl Rove propaganda here. You better look around because Karl Rove is not too popular because of his policies and who he supports. You're another one who needs someone to tell him what to think in the media. That's not logical or a coherent argument to make by appealing to them. It's foolish. Actually, Rush makes fun of Obama and his lack of eligibility.
Your venom just shows your thin skinned... Where are Trump's investigators that were supposed to be finding "amazing" things they "could hardly believe"? LOL. Another case of supposed investigators promising big things but finding nothing.
Thin skinned? Same to you...that's why you're responding to my post, and you don't take your own advice to leave this issue alone since you think it's not going anywhere. What we have is time and lots of it. Much has been found but you want someone to give you the go ahead or confirmation in the media or some wimp noodle RINO from some "approved list" what to say like a Bot. Ultimately, there is no time limit to expose Obama. The truth about Obama's past is not a problem with you for some reason.
Movements need to police themselves. When supposed conservatives such as yourself go over the edge and become obsessed with loony conspiracy theories it is the responsibility of others in the movement to at least make the minimal effort of pointing out why they are wrong.
You're so full of it. It would take Obama to admit he was unqualified for office for you to believe that it wasn't some "loony theory" and even then you would wait until Beck told you it was true.
How is that in any way relevant?