[Triple]

“When Dan Rather’s bogus documents were initially exposed on line, actual paid experts took over for news organizations of all stripe and CONFIRMED the likelihood of forgery. NOTHING like that has occurred in the case of Hussein’s long form.” - LB69

WRONG

The affidavit in the link below was written and submitted to the courts under penalty of perjury by a scanning and imaging expert.

Follow the link below to the affidavit and let me know what parts of the affidavit you find weak. You are interested in the truth, right?

http://www.scribd.com/doc/55240893/Hornbeck-v-Salazar-Re-Obama-s-Forged-Birth-Certificate-Attachments-1-Exhibit-5-11-2011

[Longbow1969]

The affidavit in the link below was written and submitted to the courts under penalty of perjury by a scanning and imaging expert.

Because someone files an affidavit with their "expert" testimony does not make it right or even something to be taken seriously. All of this birther stuff will continue to be tossed out of court. None of it will ever go anywhere.