“one of”???
You mean “the only one mentioned” perhaps?
That the guy was Jewish would obviously have thrown a monkey wrench in the narrative he wanted to construct - rather than dealing with the reality (indeed there is many a racist who would have a lover of what they consider a “lower” race).
Describing a Jewish weightlifter homosexual via his nationality of German in the context of Gandhi being an anti-semite is a double whammy - gives the image of Gandhi with a neoNazi blond blue eyed ‘Uberman’ - not a Jewish homosexual.
But why the monomaniacal focus on the lie of omission? Isn't the lie about Marcus Garvey enough for you?
LOL, there is no question that you are upset about that negative charge against Gandhi.
one of???
So Gandhi was a virgin except for the bodybuilder?
I was right about you using this to fight the anti-semitism charge against the liberal icon, it is sure a narrow argument you are making so vehemently.