I said one thing.
You asked for more.
You evidently didn't WANT more.
Too bad for you. Cry some more about it. Try to read my mind some more. Accuse me of being a liberal or having an agenda and being upset over it.
It sure doesn't make you look disinterested.
So what is YOUR interest in this article?
“Gandhi was a homosexual and an antisemite” was the main thrust vis a vis Gandhi - in this article. You don't find it at all relevant, given that context, that his homosexual lover was Jewish? LOL!!!! OK THEN!!!!!!
And just how many lies are OK? Do you have to catch a liar in every lie - or is one sufficient?
It must be really upsetting you to have you devote so much time to defending this drivel WITHOUT even once deigning to answer my questions about why you think lies are appropriate or just how many it takes before you distrust a source.
What is the relevancy of one of his lovers being Jewish?