I thought it was interesting about the anti-semitism, you have devoted an awful lot of effort to discredit that claim, yet your only argument seems to be that one of his homosexual lovers was Jewish, and that the author didn’t bother mentioning that, that and the Marcus Garvey oversight?, mistake? has you hammering at this article critical of two liberal icons.
In response you asked if there were anything else.
I pointed out the Jewish lover being identified as “German” right before launching into the ‘he is an antisemite’ line.
Sorry if, after you asked, I supplied more. I will be sure to not respond in good faith the next time you ask me for more information - lest it elicit accusations that by answering I have some sort of agenda and devotion to the issue.
You asked.
I answered.
You got upset about the answer.
You try to make this about me.
So do you take the stance that it is OK to outright lie or leave out relevant information - so long as the narrative constructed thereby tends to discredit a liberal icon?