Luther was concerned with other issues, no doubt, like indulgences, and translating the New Testament, and avoiding being killed by Leo X. Therefore, it seems that what he did not deal with, he was not called to deal with, and did not. I did not know if he had a position on prophecy or not, and it does not seem like he did, save for leaving that part of Catholicism alone.
It does seem like things are progressing pretty fast, though, as I said, I am Reformed, and tend toward semi-preterism. Prophecies can be fulfilled more than once.
I tend to be Lutheran, where I started, I asked the Holy Spirit for the truth about Israel around 1985. I used to be antisemitic. The revelations have been wonderful. The institutional Lutheran and mainline churches that teach replacement theology do not have a clue about the times we are in. Preterism and partial preterism adore replacement theology. Normalcy bias rules.
Question: Full preterism is wrong why? I assume because John wrote Revelation in AD 90 and the temple was destroyed in AD 70? Don't full preterists try to date it before?
Some wonderful FRiends:Quix, Alamo-Girl, GiovannaNicoletta, have much wisdom about the times we live in.
Mad Dawg is a wonderful catholic that follows replacement theology but is willing to discuss.
Matchett-PI is a brilliant partial preterist that adores replacement theology and hates the rapture.