Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
No, it merely requires a more reasonable assumption of the original distribution of the elements that would better match the requirements of life on Earth.

Why would Uranium consistently be distributed along with all the daughter elements of radiometric decay, in ratios consistent with billions of years worth of radiologic decay, at the molecular level? Stable elements do not exhibit this kind of homogenous distribution. What is reasonable about assuming that this distribution of radioisotopes is a requirement of life on Earth?

114 posted on 05/04/2011 2:25:58 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

Your reply is essentially nonsequitur, and tends toward demolishing your owm assumptions.


116 posted on 05/04/2011 7:21:42 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson