To: rocco55
IIRC from seeing the image a couple of times yesterday I don't think there is any wording anywhere on the document that states it's an official document. The one they used for comparison said across the bottom that was an official document. There was nothing along the lower border of the Obama document.
I could be wrong, I didn't spend a lot time looking at it. But I did notice how much of the typed text on the Obama document was centered, as though it had been done with a word processor. On the other one the fields that were perfectly centered on the Obama document were left justified, as you would expect it be when typed by hand.
Just my casual observations!
12 posted on
04/28/2011 4:52:56 PM PDT by
jwparkerjr
(I would rather lose with Sarah than win with a RINO!)
To: jwparkerjr
The problem this time around, just as with the posting of the alleged Certification of Live Birth earlier, is chain of custody. In both cases, the supposed proof was provided by Obama campaign/administration officials. Im sorry, but that just won't fly.
Were this truly an innocent attempt to just release what exists in the Hawaiian archives, then why not simply authorize the Hawaii Department of Vital Records to release it directly to media representatives without the Obama middlemen? That fact alone tells me that this smells of fraud once again.
13 posted on
04/28/2011 4:58:56 PM PDT by
noiseman
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: jwparkerjr
The new White House doc has Alvin Onaka’s stamped and dated signature at the bottom. Doesn’t this imply a degree of liability for him as the endorsing State Registrar ?
19 posted on
04/28/2011 5:09:11 PM PDT by
rocco55
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson