Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: matt1234

Keep in mind, assuming the BC is legitimate (and I do), Stanley Ann was the source and provider of most of the info on the form.

We can’t even be sure Sr. was the genetic father.

Really.


5 posted on 04/28/2011 2:21:03 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: savedbygrace
Keep in mind, assuming the BC is legitimate (and I do), Stanley Ann was the source and provider of most of the info on the form.

True, but Wiki says 1936 while the alien registration card says 1934. It's not just Stanley Ann saying 1936.

9 posted on 04/28/2011 2:28:10 PM PDT by matt1234 (Union rank-and-file are now dem brownshirt rank-and-file.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace
That's been my opinion all along: Stanley Ann Dunham actually had no idea who sired her child.

Given the fact that she was 17 when impregnated, the "subject" just might have been guilty of statutory rape.

Given the age(s) of BHO, Sr., this was no case of "Romeo/Juliette romance.

20 posted on 04/28/2011 2:41:06 PM PDT by zerosix (native sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace

“We can’t even be sure Sr. was the genetic father.”

Good point.

That is why we do not only need to require all candidates to present their BC’s buy we also need to have DNA Teating of the candidates, their parents and grandparents.


21 posted on 04/28/2011 2:43:04 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: savedbygrace

Did he ever pay any child support in the divorce?


28 posted on 04/28/2011 2:52:05 PM PDT by Pinetop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson