Me either. I'm getting whiplash.
On a couple of other threads, I was proposing logical explanations for a few things that people were excited about. (Most of which I got from other FReepers) I started to look into some other points that had me concerned to see if they, too, could be rationalized and then a thought hit me: How many oddities does it take before it's just too much of a stretch for anyone to buy that this document is legit?
I would say that three good weird things that have less than obvious explanations would be easily acceptable for me.
OK, then what about four? Five? Ten? Would I be able to accept more than a dozen things that point to an object being a fake if someone sat me down and said, "I know it looks wrong; but, you see..."
I quit counting "off points" at twelve a few hours ago.
I don’t know Marie, I was convinced early in the day it was a legit document from the archives, but as the day wears on I am starting to get that bad feeling in my stomach. This guy in the video makes a pretty convincing case without dipping into the “layering” and race of the father and the addresses and names of the hospital and the stuff that was pretty easy to dismiss.
This video feels pretty devastating, the guy sure sounds like he has been down this road before.