Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: westcoastwillieg

Here is my question for the sake of comparisons: My DH’s parents were born in Mexico, one in 1906 and the other in 1910. They came here in about 1923 to escape the revolutions going on in Mexico. They did not know each other until later. They were from different states in Mexico. They married in the US and had 10 kids, 2 of whom served in the military and retired from the military. Neither of them became US Citizens, but did hold the green card and paid taxes and lived by the laws of the nation. The kids were educated in CA and by order of their parents were to speak English at school and Spanish at home.
I contend my husband and his siblings are native born citizens but not natural born citizens. What say the experts on the subject? Am I right or wrong?


40 posted on 04/27/2011 10:38:52 PM PDT by celtic gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: celtic gal

according to the absolutist view, not this new found nonsense, your husband is a eligible to be president.

consider that Michael Dukakis rand for president with two Greek born parents and not one iota of an issue was there because he was born inside the USA.

This issue is a bigger bs distraction than declaring obama is ineligible because he wears the wrong color shirt.


105 posted on 04/29/2011 1:00:23 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson