[sargon]

Don’t give a damn for Romney (RINO and non Conservative) but if he is the one running against Obama, he has my vote.

Romney is an uapologetic a gun-banner. The "lesser of two evils argument" does not hold water when it comes to Romney's rabid and unconstitutional hostility towards the Second Amendment.

I'd prefer to preserve my sacred honor in that case.

Yes, even if it means Obama is reelected.

If the GOP Establishment manages somehow to engineer a Romney nomination (and Rove and his ilk have done the best they can so far) they absolutely deserve to lose the Presidential election in 2012, and, IMHO, the fault will lie with them, not the voters who refuse to embrace Romney...

[backwoods-engineer]

Romney is an uapologetic a gun-banner. The "lesser of two evils argument" does not hold water when it comes to Romney's rabid and unconstitutional hostility towards the Second Amendment. I'd prefer to preserve my sacred honor in that case. Yes, even if it means Obama is reelected.

I agree COMPLETELY. If Romney is the candidate, it was because of chicanery, and I have no obligation to vote for him simply because he opposes Obama in public. In private, he and Obama are buds, and have the same goals.