+1 for Mitt.
Just this once. :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Please don’t bother me with your pain - King RINO is not worthy of mention in my world!
96 posted on
04/25/2011 9:42:35 PM PDT by
J Edgar
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I think Romney is a wishy/washy as they come, and I will vote for the GOP nominee, but I know for sure, if it's Romney, he cannot defeat Obummer!
WE seriously cannot be split up & have to find a really STRONG candidate, this country cannot survive til 2012 under Obummer, 4 more years of him & we will be all under marxist/muzzie rule. America will be no more.
101 posted on
04/25/2011 10:06:15 PM PDT by
blondee123
(TRUMP=WINNING OBAMA=YOU'RE FIRED!!!)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
What is with you guys?
You have an infatuation with liberal Republicans.
Next you'll be promoting Giuliani.
NO Trump, NO Romney and NO Giuliani!
103 posted on
04/25/2011 10:40:29 PM PDT by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Yes, Mitt Romney sounds competent on trade policy. Too bad he's an authoritarian socialist. Given his stance on several other, even more critical issues (like, say, the Second Amendment and socialized medicine) I could care less what Mitt has to say about trade policy. For Chrissake, he's running for President of the United States.
Let's elect a President who has a clue on Freedom, Patriotism, and unalienable rights.
And then let Sarah nominate him for Secretary of Commerce or something suitable to his qualifications, because
Gun-banner Mitt Romney is not fit to be President...
104 posted on
04/25/2011 10:59:02 PM PDT by
sargon
(I don't like the sound of these "boncentration bamps")
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Mitt’s really not stupid and he’s (and Palin, Trump, et al.) picked up on the voter’s message that was sent to the GOP in 2010.
109 posted on
04/26/2011 1:16:33 AM PDT by
Rudder
(The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Talk is cheap, and Romney has a speech for every listener!
I won't support any candidare who shows the slightest possibility of wavering on RKBA, amnesty for illegals and the other core conservative principles.
Romney is go along to get along, the end justifies the means wishy washy from top to bottom.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
NO MITT.NO TRUMP.
NO RINOs.
112 posted on
04/26/2011 2:20:37 AM PDT by
Allegra
(Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
He aint got the charisma needed to beat Obama
114 posted on
04/26/2011 2:30:49 AM PDT by
expatguy
(Support "An American Expat in Southeast Asia" - DONATE)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Yet to hear RomneyIdiot explain away RomneyCare..... =.=
117 posted on
04/26/2011 5:53:20 AM PDT by
cranked
To: Cringing Negativism Network; All
No vote for Romney here, no matter what he says. He is a gun-grabber, and therefore an oathbreaker. He is telling a LIE if he pledges to protect and defend the Constitution.
118 posted on
04/26/2011 5:57:54 AM PDT by
backwoods-engineer
(Any politician who holds that the state accords rights is an oathbreaker and an "enemy... domestic.")
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Almost as good as Trump. Chisel that on the headstone of the Republican Party.
123 posted on
04/26/2011 6:43:00 AM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(You say your'e conservative, but you support liberals. Should I believe your words or your actions?)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
...doesn’t surprise me. Romney is a great follower - not so much on leading.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I could barely watch the interview. All I saw was a slime ball. Other thoughts that came to mind were “weasel” and “serpent.” I can’t in good conscience vote for him and I’m not falling for the “split the party” argument because that’s how we keep getting these dems in office. I’m not calling them Rhinos any more, either. They’re nothing more than dem infiltrators.
130 posted on
04/26/2011 12:24:55 PM PDT by
pops88
(geek chick over 40)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Personally I would not trust either one of the as far as I could throw their house.
131 posted on
04/26/2011 3:55:38 PM PDT by
RetiredNavy
("Only accurate firearms are interesting")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson