1 posted on
04/14/2011 3:54:21 PM PDT by
Borges
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: DollyCali
2 posted on
04/14/2011 3:57:01 PM PDT by
Borges
To: Borges
I give Roger Ebert one finger.
3 posted on
04/14/2011 3:58:39 PM PDT by
seowulf
("If you write a whole line of zeroes, it's still---nothing"...Kira Alexandrovna Argounova)
To: Borges
Unsurprising that this would be lost on a elitist lickspittle like Ebert.
4 posted on
04/14/2011 3:59:28 PM PDT by
Noumenon
("How do we know when the Government is like that guy with the van and the handcuffs?" --Henry Bowman)
To: Borges
What a smug, condescending review!
Well, gee! I was eagerly awaiting Atlas Shrugged to show up in my local theater, and I was all set to go.
But now? Ebert says I’ll be disappointed. So I guess I’ll stay at work instead.
NOT!!!
5 posted on
04/14/2011 3:59:32 PM PDT by
Tigerized
(pursuingliberty.com)
To: Borges
This may be disappointing for libertarians, who I believe enjoy rumpy-pumpy as much as anyone. Well, he's managed to ruin the movie and sex in one article. Way to go, Rog......
6 posted on
04/14/2011 3:59:39 PM PDT by
edpc
(Tagline under construction: Your American Recovery and Reinvestment Act dollars at work.)
To: Borges
It’s Roger Ebert. What can you expect from a Leftist.
7 posted on
04/14/2011 4:00:24 PM PDT by
fwdude
(The world is sleeping in the dark that the Church just can't fight, 'cause it's asleep in the light.)
To: Borges
Go to hell Roger Ebert, or “R. Hyde”, or “Reinhold Timme”, or whatever your real name is.
9 posted on
04/14/2011 4:02:04 PM PDT by
jpl
To: Borges
Can't possibly be worse than this movie...
11 posted on
04/14/2011 4:02:22 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both)
To: Borges
Rarely, perhaps never, has television news covered the laying of new railroad track with the breathless urgency of the news channels shown in this movie.
Poor Roger, all the flashy lights and Spec Effects have stunted his imagination. Poor Roger.
12 posted on
04/14/2011 4:02:54 PM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(It is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; ~Vattel's Law of Nations)
To: Borges
“limousines driving through cities in ruin and arriving at ornate buildings;”
Has this clown never visited the liberal paradise of DETROIT?
13 posted on
04/14/2011 4:02:54 PM PDT by
tcrlaf
(2012 Slogan: "You'd Have To Be Insane, To Vote For Hussein!")
To: Borges
feh...
14 posted on
04/14/2011 4:02:57 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Borges
So you see how governments and unions are the enemy of visionary entrepreneurs.
They are the enemy of everyone.
To: Borges
But you’re thinking, railroads? Yes, although airplanes exist in this future, trains are where it’s at. I guess Ebert missed Obama constantly pushing high speed rail projects...and the continuing funding of the non-profit Amtrak. Dems believe rail is the transportation of the future!
To: Borges
Roger EbertThis says it all . . . now I can't wait to see it . . . If this goober hates it, it's probably good.
22 posted on
04/14/2011 4:08:39 PM PDT by
laweeks
To: Borges
a-hole!
and I suppose the movie Young Guns was “in the future” when the glory of riding horses was supposed to be all the rage?
IT’S A PERIOD MOVIE! jagoff!
sarc - no I agree with the Libertarians that the future is the rise of great trains again /sarc
(although to listen to liberals like 0, THEY actually do think trains are the answer)
23 posted on
04/14/2011 4:09:40 PM PDT by
Optimist
To: Borges
I guess Robert has his panties in a bunch because he realized there’s no need for snarky fruits in Galt’s Gulch.
To: Borges
Yo, Ebert:
29 posted on
04/14/2011 4:15:11 PM PDT by
glock rocks
(Wait, what?)
To: Borges; All
This from the fool that said ‘Scarface’ was the best movie he had ever seen. What did you expect?
32 posted on
04/14/2011 4:18:18 PM PDT by
notdownwidems
(Vote Republican! We're 1/10 of 1% better than the other guys!)
To: Borges
Atlas Shrugged is not Che’ enough for Ebert. Makes me want to see it even more.
33 posted on
04/14/2011 4:19:01 PM PDT by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: Borges
Roger Ebert, I thought he was dead!
Well, seeing as he hated the movie, most of us here will love it.
I’ll pony up the bucks to see it and take the hubby along.
36 posted on
04/14/2011 4:21:16 PM PDT by
TheConservativeParty
(POTUS 45 Sarah Palin....Resistance is futile! Prepare to be liberated!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson