Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave

That’s the way you see much of the argument play out.

Many re-write it like this...

48


2(9+3)

It’s just not how the order of operations goes.


82 posted on 04/12/2011 4:49:28 PM PDT by hobbes1 (Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to...." ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: hobbes1

Yep.


83 posted on 04/12/2011 4:53:52 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: hobbes1

I could give some people the benefit of the doubt that they are simply reading everything to the right of the / as the denominator. But they insist on making silly arguments about the distributive property, etc. to justify what they are doing. Like claiming 2(x+y) means something different than 2*(x+y).


84 posted on 04/12/2011 5:06:32 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: hobbes1; SoothingDave
this site says it's 2
87 posted on 04/12/2011 5:18:30 PM PDT by tioga ( Proud Proofer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson