Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Liberty1970
While of course it would be essential to know what is taking place, if everything posted here can be taken at face value, I could care less if it is chemical, nuclear, or a rice krispy treat concoction as long as:

Total cost per MW is reasonable.
Source material is abundant.
Waste is not an uncontrollable environmental issue.

12 posted on 04/07/2011 7:37:57 AM PDT by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Wurlitzer

Here’s my understanding of what Rossi has said:

Initial cost will be 1 cent per kWh

Nickel is the 25th most common element in the world. Rossi says the amount needed for his device should not impact the cost of the raw material (meaning it doesn’t use up large quantaties)

The waste is not radioactive.

I’m hoping he’s being straight with us.


17 posted on 04/07/2011 4:54:49 PM PDT by Normandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Wurlitzer

Another point. Rossi says that the catalyst (while a trade secret) is not a precious metal.

You can read ongoing dialogue between Rossi and the public at his web site here:

http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360#comments


18 posted on 04/07/2011 4:59:15 PM PDT by Normandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson