Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

You arent going to find many scientists who admit they know very little.


7 posted on 03/31/2011 11:59:54 AM PDT by MiltonFriedmanFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MiltonFriedmanFan
Einstein was one of those scientists who had learned during his long career, that the more he learned, the less he knew, and was the first to admit it.

He was such a wonderful and humble genius. Which in effect WAS his genius. He believed in God with out prejudice.

It has always been a big problem for me that these “scientists”, claim that the “Big Bang” thrust all matter to it's current position in the Universe in a matter of seconds, when we can only observe these formations in relation to the speed of light and currently see them as they were over a Billion years ago.

I am inclined to agree with Einstein's first model was based on a stable, infinite Universe that has always been here and was not the product of a cosmic explosion that violates all Universal law. Hawking, Susskind and String Theory can pound sand.

15 posted on 03/31/2011 12:13:01 PM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Patriotic by Proxy! (Cause I'm a nutcase and it's someone Else's' fault!....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: MiltonFriedmanFan
You arent going to find many scientists who admit they know very little.

The better they are, and the more they know, the more likely they are to admit that they know almost nothing. This has been my long experience of scientists.

41 posted on 03/31/2011 2:29:51 PM PDT by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson