Listen, who CARES what the lawyer or you RomneyBOTs think.
The COURT DID NOT MAKE THE LAW.
Instead, your beloved Bishop Mitt Romney,
who you defend over and over,
IMPOSED a “LAW” HE made up on the spot,
and which Bishop Romney forced it down the throats
of the court CLERKS. They SAID so.
Romney DID NOT have to do this, did he?
But you support him on this, dont’ you.
Just like you support RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE.
Shooo. So go back to DU and Soros.
I'm guessing the answer to that is not you. I think most people actually care about facts. May be why the people you keep pestering aren't responding.
You keep thinking this is about Romney, and that drives you to lose your objectivity, and apparently your interest in knowing facts. This is about you posting inaccurate information, and refusing to consider the experts who explain how you are wrong. This is about you misleading conservatives who read this and expect that most things here are accurate, and that's why I correct your comments.
Romney DID NOT have to do this, did he?
No, he did not "have" to do anything. He could have ignored the court. He could have supported the executive branch ignoring the court's ruling. We know that is possible, because we see Obama doing it time and time again, ignoring a court telling him the drilling ban was illegal, ignoring a court telling him Obamacare is unconstitutional, ignoring the war powers act.
So there is no question that Romney could have ignored the court. The real question though is whether that would have made any difference. As the legal expert I quoted for you explained, it would not.
We needed the legislature to "fix" the law by making it clear that "man" and "woman" meant opposite sex -- but being liberal democrats, they refused to do so. And we needed them to vote sufficiently to put a constitutional amendment on the ballot, which they did the first time but not the required second time, again because they were liberal democrats.
Just like you support RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE
I don't support either. In 2008, I understood the argument made for Romneycare, but didn't agree with it. I've never understood the defense of it after it was clearly failing; I have strongly opposed Obamacare, including writing about it publicly.
But you have once again decided to speak without the facts, and that has led to your continuing errors of fact and conclusion.