Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg

She’s not that old. Wouldn’t these be considered child porn if the pictures were taken prior to her being 18?


5 posted on 03/16/2011 9:59:02 AM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pnh102

She’s was over 18. She was born in 1988.


8 posted on 03/16/2011 10:00:03 AM PDT by Perdogg (What Would Aqua Buddha do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102

If she’s 22 now and the first pictures came out 4 years ago, then she was likely 18 when they were taken, possibly 17, which would be an issue.

Lesson to the “lady”: if you don’t want nude pics of you released in public, don’t have nude pics taken. Once taken, they WILL leak, sooner or later.


12 posted on 03/16/2011 10:01:47 AM PDT by kevkrom (De-fund Obamacare in 2011, repeal in 2013!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: pnh102

She’s not that old. Wouldn’t these be considered child porn if the pictures were taken prior to her being 18?

You know how people in their young 20’s are. They think years ago is 2 years. lol.


13 posted on 03/16/2011 10:03:17 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson