Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void

Nope. Unless and until an actual birth certificate demonstrating that parentage surfaces, legally it’s just hearsay...

______________________________________________________________________________________

I am sorry but it is not ‘hearsay’. There is a legally bonafide divorce on record in Hawaii. The documents of that divorce show a child as part of the marriage. Unless Obama Sr. ADOPTED Obama II as a stepchild, and nothing points to that, he (Obama Sr.) IS the legal birth father of Obama II.

Legally, the fatherhood is established and in the formal Hawaii records.

As noted, the released documents has a missing or possibly legally redacted page. In all likelihood this is a birth document of some type for the child. It is a fact that the child is not explicitly named in the remaining pages of the documents. But unless Stanly Ann and Obama Sr. had a different child it would have to be Obama II.

I am certainly not arguing against full transparency here. That should be done. That includes the original birth documents, even if they are under legal seal due to later closed adoption proceedings. But from what HAS been released the only conclusion of LEGAL fact is that Obama’s birth father was Obama Senior.

Any other scenarios seem to only serve to dull Occam’s razor on this key issue.


34 posted on 03/15/2011 10:20:54 AM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: bluecat6
Nope. Unless and until an actual birth certificate demonstrating that parentage surfaces, legally it’s just hearsay... ______________________________________________________________________________________ I am sorry but it is not ‘hearsay’. There is a legally bonafide divorce on record in Hawaii. The documents of that divorce show a child as part of the marriage. Unless Obama Sr. ADOPTED Obama II as a stepchild, and nothing points to that, he (Obama Sr.) IS the legal birth father of Obama II.

Legally, the fatherhood is established and in the formal Hawaii records.

******

Your explanation above seems reasonable. So I would think that Obama would have no problem releasing his Hawaii long form birth certificate to verify once and for all that Obama senior was indeed his birth father, because his parents' divorce papers already tell us that Obama senior was Obama's birth father.

But why Obama won't release his long form birth certificate is beyond me.

However, because Obama refuses to release his Hawaii long form birth certificate if Obama senior was indeed his birth father, I can only conclude that there is something else on his Hawaii long form birth certificate---if it even exist---that he does not want us to see and that would do serious damage to his political career when the public found out about the damaging information.

So I wish there was some way that you could persuade Obama to release his Hawaii long form birth certificate so that his Hawaii long form birth certificate can easily back up what his parents' divorce seems to tell us: Obama senior was Obama junior's birth father.

57 posted on 03/15/2011 1:55:43 PM PDT by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson