To: jazusamo
Hyperbole from any position creates lots of heat, but not much light.
This is so much Bullshit!*
Quadrillions of fluorescent bulbs have been used in office buildings, warehouses, factories and homes in the last 100 years, discarded, and most ponds in America is still just fine, thankyouverymuch.
If more nuclear plants are built, and energy returns to "too cheap to meter," I might return to incandescents.
8 posted on
03/10/2011 2:07:18 PM PST by
Publius6961
(There has Never been a "Tax On The Rich" that has not reached the middle class)
To: Publius6961
I don't think any law should have been passed to in effect limit and then force incandescent use out. Let the market decide, if they're indeed cost effective the people will eventually switch over anyway.
18 posted on
03/10/2011 2:15:35 PM PST by
jazusamo
(His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
To: Publius6961
I'm not highly worried over impounded water contamination from Hg in fluorescents. I am, however, quite concerned that there is now, and will be for a long time, exposure to young humans from household compact fluorescents, and that embriologic and epidemiologic examinations (based on neurological toxic issues among other things) won't have sufficient data to reveal toxicity for a decade or so.
It's more of an inhalation issue than a drinking water issue.
.
21 posted on
03/10/2011 2:19:10 PM PST by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Publius6961
Ya lost me at “Quadrillions “
39 posted on
03/10/2011 3:33:05 PM PST by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson