Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MsLady
I think this is a HUGE victory for Walker and the GOP.

The only "mistake" I am worried about is whether or not they broke the rules by not waiting 24 hours like the RAT Minority Leader claimed. It would be a shame to lose this on a technicality in the courts. Of course, the RAT could just be lying through his teeth.

Anybody know for sure whether or not passing the bill in the way they did violated any procedural rules?

16 posted on 03/09/2011 7:49:25 PM PST by comebacknewt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: comebacknewt

I agree. I heard Greta talking about just that thing. Someone not politically connected to either party that works at the capital and over sees these things, said every thing appeared to be exactly done the way WI constitution said it needed to be done.


37 posted on 03/09/2011 7:56:09 PM PST by MsLady (Be the kind of woman that when you get up in the morning, the devil says, "Oh crap, she's UP !!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: comebacknewt

The Wisconsin Open Meetings Act requires 24 hours notice before a public meeting (including a legislative committee meeting), unless there is “good cause” to forego such notice, or unless it is impossible or impractical to provide such notice. Frankly, given how long this has gone on, I think it is difficult to argue that there was “good cause” to schedule this meeting with so little notice, or that it was impossible/impracticable to give notice beforehand. I really don’t know why they rushed it; they would have lost nothing by waiting until tomorrow for the committee meeting (or, alternatively, giving notice yesterday for today’s meeting).


49 posted on 03/09/2011 7:58:48 PM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: comebacknewt
This falls within the "collective bargaining" exception in that same law.

If that's involved the rules don't apply. In any case, if the legislature already had a different "rule" in place (like a "rule" for a specific bill), none of that stuff applies.

Anytime somebody tells you that a regulation or law supersedes the constitutional rules governing Congress or state legislature they are making a NULL CASE argument. The Constitution always takes precedence over laws and rules. Only members vote. Judges have no vote in the legislature.

71 posted on 03/09/2011 8:07:29 PM PST by muawiyah (Make America Safe For Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: comebacknewt

So pass it again in 24 hours.


105 posted on 03/09/2011 8:45:20 PM PST by ctdonath2 (Great children's books - http://www.UsborneBooksGA.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: comebacknewt

Sen. Fitzgerald’s Statement: “We have confirmed with the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the Legislative Council and the Legislative Reference Bureau that every item in tonight’s bill follows the letter of the law.

“The people of Wisconsin elected us to come to Madison and do a job. Just because the Senate Democrats won’t do theirs, doesn’t mean we won’t do ours.”


135 posted on 03/09/2011 11:56:07 PM PST by Politicalmom (America-The Land of the Sheep, the Home of the Caved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson