No charges for failing to contain an aggressive dog? No charages even though the dog was, according to the police, aggressive?
That suggests strongly that the police quickly figured out that the dog’s behavior wasn’t a primary problem in the case, and several commentators indicated that the animal was petted by several students.
Finally:
“thats what i been trying to say what if the bullet ricochete and hit A INNOCENT person look where thunder was shot at in the flower bed by the building but he charged her and she shot him is what she claims ok then why was he shot in the back of his head and out his throat WHY because she shot him from behind he NEVER charged her”
Why would a cop shoot a charging dog in the BACK of its head?
Time for yet another “Magic Bullet Theory”.
If the cop was behind the dog as it allegedly chased a kid, she was shooting toward the kid, too.
Comforting thought.
Why does anybody attempt a difficult task? Because it's a challenge!