I am concerned that Boeing cannot deliver at the proposed price. The airplane does not exist even in a full design. I understand that the price is firm but I think the taxpayer is still at risk. I would have preferred a split order. Both planes have some distinct advantages. I understand that a split order was not on the table but I think that it should have been considered.
The concept of a split-buy was considered but the cost for such an acquisition approach was extraordinarily high. You see, you would have to set up two completely different acquisition programs, program management, sustainment processes, support protocols and AGE equipment, training centers for crew and maintainers, as well as different logistics programs. That makes the concept cost-prohibitive.
Buying two different tankers is a world apart from, say, buying two different cars for your home. Much more involved and some much more costly.
“I understand that a split order was not on the table but I think that it should have been considered.”
From what I heard it was considered, it was determined not to be acceptable.
Boeing is too big to fail.
Really? Do you wanna tell me what this is? Introducing the Italian Air Force Boeing KC-767A. The link has pictures of it landing.