No I’m not a lamer or a 3rd grader and I wasn’t the one that brought this thread to the attention of the moderators. If I’m going to do that I will do it publicly as I have here.
When someone says “Falco has become protective to the extreme” and “At about 20’ he came unglued.” it means they have a dangerous dog. When they revel in how mean their dog is they are no different than the gang banger with a pit bull. Dogs who behave like that are dangerous. They hurt and kill people all the time. The dogs usually pay with their lives but its their owners fault. Just as in this case.
And when someone says “u kill my dog though for any reason and i will probably get yours in time..i will always avenge my boy” it means they are refusing to accept responsibility for their animal. If applied to this case it would be the dead dogs owner killing the surviving dog when it was clearly the problem.
So yeah I have a problem with dog owners who cannot control their animals and refuse to accept responsibility. Its hardly a conservative value to seek revenge when you are clearly in the wrong.
Have a good life.
And what, exactly, does *any* of that have to do with falsely accusing Wardaddy _in writing on a public forum_ of threatening to murder someone?
He could, if he wanted, nail you for libel, I think.
Somebody made a false accusation about me on Yahoo once and they revoked her account, deleted her business website and banned her...just for saying something *much less* serious.
[I didn’t bother to sue her blind although my lawyer said I could]
And I rest my case...here you are [again] whining to the MODs.
Do you think they have nothing better to do than babysit you?
Theirs is a serious job and you’re little more than a joke.