Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bigtigermike

The fact that she had to clarify herself is proof enough Einstein.


38 posted on 03/03/2011 9:11:44 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (You have entered an invalid birthday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: BigSkyFreeper

No! Because she never said that she disagreed with the Court in anyway - we are talking about the liberal MSM that is looking for blaring news to get hits mostly on their websites - just like the other day when news had: ‘Palin bashes Michele Obama’ but when I saw the video, Sarah was just making a light hearted joke. But you still can’t prove outside of the liberal MSM interpetation where she was making such an ascertion!


44 posted on 03/03/2011 9:19:57 PM PST by Bigtigermike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: BigSkyFreeper

To 38 - She should not have ‘clarified’ a perfectly understandable statement. Rather, she should have suggested some people might look into taking remedial English classes.


90 posted on 03/04/2011 12:31:39 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson