Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BunnySlippers

I’d say the photo is inconclusive. It was late night. She looks relatively normal, especially considering the bright florescent lights in most police stations. She probably should not have been “arrested”, if she was.


2 posted on 03/01/2011 4:53:28 PM PST by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: shalom aleichem

I’d say more media side tracking from important stuff of life and the more stupid of Americans following the herd.


4 posted on 03/01/2011 4:55:55 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: shalom aleichem

No one else would look any better in that picture. It proves means nothing.

OTOH, I do take issue with whomever called her “beautiful”.

Why is it that every female pop “singer” (and I use the term singer liberally) and every half baked female celebrity that doesn’t make you barf is referred to by the press as “beautiful”?

Is that the standard of beauty? She didn’t make me toss my cookies? Someone must be giving out a lot of free beer goggles to the people that follow celebrities around.


24 posted on 03/01/2011 6:20:19 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s ( If you can remember the 60s....you weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson