I think you are in denial...your post has everything to do with the story and now you are trying to make yourself sound better and trying to make me sound bad. I took nothing out of context...you wrote God allowing this to prevent fatherlessness as a lesser evil...what the heck! These women would be better off without a father figure like him! And who gives a rats behind which sin is worse! Sin is sin and unless they are seen they will all lead to the darkness. Why did you not address the wrongness of his actions at all? Why? Instead you sort of tried to make it sound not so bad. Why? I think you are morally weak and I mean that kindly! It’s like you have nothing to write abouit this man’s selfishness??
You are an illiterate troll, and not concerned in any way with God.
If you are not illiterate, how is it that you are incapable of looking at my post 17 and looking at the bottom of the post wherein there is a little number that tells anyone which post it is replying to.
Or is it that once you began to lie about my intentions, empirical evidence that gets in the way of continuing to do so doesn't matter?
You wish to continue plying your little lie that I referenced post 1 rather than 3. Unfortunately for liars like yourself, Free Republic lists the information that exposes your personal little lie at the bottom of every post