Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

D.C. police officer shoots dog in Foxhall Crescents
TBD.com ^ | February 15, 2011 | ABC7

Posted on 02/18/2011 11:26:26 AM PST by Immerito

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: blau993
First, Labs are and have been for many years the most popular breed in the US. The numbers of Labs in the sample population almost surely dwarf the numbers of any of the other breeds mentioned.

Ok, but that doesn't negate the fact that Labs Bite.

Second, there is no information about how closely the statistic takers adhered to definitions of the breed. There are a lot of mix breeds that have some Lab in them. How many of those were counted as "Labs" in the sampling? I would submit that a Lab/Shepherd or a Lab/Rottweiler have different personalities and temperments than a purebred Lab.

Ok, so how do we know if the dog in this story wasn't a "mix". Would you agree that what most people call "Labs" are most likely "Lab-mixes", and that true purebred Labs are comparatively rare? Further, if we don't have information regarding how closely the statistic takers adhered to breed definitions, isn't it also true that they could have meticulously adhered to such distinctions?

Finally, there is no information from which you could tell how many of the "bites" were offensive or how many were "defensive." My Labs are big guys, and the older is a decidedly Alpha Male. I could not imagine them ever being aggressive toward a person who was acting normally in their presence. I once put the older Lab in a "down stay" so that he could be petted by an autistic child. The child made odd noises, spastic movements, pulled the dog's ear and got nothing but a sloppy kiss as his reward. However, I could imagine them, particularly the older one, acting very aggressively toward someone who made a threatening move toward them or toward me or my wife. In other words, not all "bites" are equal.

Does a "defensive" bite hurt less than an "offensive" bite? Is a person who was maimed or killed by a Lab any less dead if the Lab was only reacting "defensively"?

The point here was that people in this thread were claiming that Labs NEVER act aggressively. That is simply not true.

41 posted on 02/18/2011 1:56:52 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Immerito
A quick Google search of real estate prices in Foxhall Crescents tells me the dog's owner probably spent a good bit of money on a purebred lab, and probably has quite a bit more coin to drop on a purebred attorney.
42 posted on 02/18/2011 2:07:25 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
When Barney Fife WITH ammo is allowed to roam the streets to "cap" anything his pathetic ego needs, to justify his sorry and immature self-image, then that sad sack of personal issues is little more than a thug with a, very real plastic badge, who needs to be weeded out of a group of people who can violate the citizen`s Constitutionally inalienable protected rights. Simply because he-she-it says so is not sufficient reason, they`re no more "special", than "We The People" whom THEY SERVE.(Something the state seems to forget, these days). The courts tend to side with the entity of the state, given it`s natural affiliation, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”, so given the statist trend in America, we don`t need more power in the hands of “Barney Fifes” around the country, we need less.

So yes, I don`t automatically side with Barney Fife, I want to hear ALL the facts, and it does seem that Barney over reacted here. I`m sure you don`t think so, but maybe you also agree with the Government workers in Wisconsin as well? I know a great many gov. workers here in Ohio, a part time Barney Fife too, and their attitudes are pretty much the same, "Screw the f-ing little people, where`s my god damn money?", now only one is a wanna-be, the rest don`t carry those plastic badges, but God help us with the ones that do.

43 posted on 02/18/2011 2:24:50 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: nomad
When Barney Fife WITH ammo is allowed to roam the streets to "cap" anything his pathetic ego needs, to justify his sorry and immature self-image, then that sad sack of personal issues is little more than a thug with a, very real plastic badge, who needs to be weeded out of a group of people who can violate the citizen`s Constitutionally inalienable protected rights. Simply because he-she-it says so is not sufficient reason, they`re no more "special", than "We The People" whom THEY SERVE.(Something the state seems to forget, these days). The courts tend to side with the entity of the state, given it`s natural affiliation, “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely”, so given the statist trend in America, we don`t need more power in the hands of “Barney Fifes” around the country, we need less.

Ah, I see, so you were at the scene of this shooting and you know all the details? That being the case, can you give us some more specifics, because the news article is quite lacking in the details.

Also, can you explain who all makes up the "We the people" in your statement? Does it include people who disagree with your worldview?

So yes, I don`t automatically side with Barney Fife, I want to hear ALL the facts, and it does seem that Barney over reacted here.

Wait, you WEREN'T THERE? I thought you were, and that you could give us specifics. If you WEREN'T actually there, how can you make ANY assumptions?

I`m sure you don`t think so, but maybe you also agree with the Government workers in Wisconsin as well?

What possibly would lead you to that conclusion? Or are you just pulling up this red herring out of desperation?

I know a great many gov. workers here in Ohio, a part time Barney Fife too, and their attitudes are pretty much the same, "Screw the f-ing little people, where`s my god damn money?", now only one is a wanna-be, the rest don`t carry those plastic badges, but God help us with the ones that do.

Define "great many". Can you also admit that your perception might be altered by the people you choose to associate with?

44 posted on 02/18/2011 2:51:26 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

I’m wondering if it’s OK to shoot a cop who pulls a gun on one’s dog while the dog is on one’s private property? I’d think it would be self defense of family.


45 posted on 02/18/2011 5:03:58 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
So if a cop says so, it`s so? And YOU were there, so
YOU KNOW he was justified, yes? The article seems to give enough to get a good feel for the story, a gated community, the dog was “acting aggressively”, and he was certainly in his right to blast away, in a community with, one would assume families in houses nearby,right? What did he have for firepower? a .40SW, a .45ACP? Are the houses in the area stone masonry, brick, stick frame and dry wall? What was his back stop, a family of four`s home? There are many further questions involved beyond “ He`s officer friendly, so he`s always right.”. The “We The People” refers to the majority of we the voting people, in the last election, who voted to at least limit the monetary scope and arbitrating power, that includes the police, of the state and it`s employees, they do work for that "We The People", yes? The article leaves many questions unanswered and I did say we need to determine the FACTS, not assume that Barney Fife is always in the right, you did read that, right?

While I`ll not give you MY personal story, suffice it to say that for the last number of years I`ve been employed by the state of Ohio as a part-timer, deal with the further lack of information. But I did get the opportunity to volunteer my help with a tribute to a war hero, killed in Iraq, and held in a neighboring city. The wanna-be, who worked part-time for the city PD it was held in, held a little pow-wow with two full timers employed there, and the denigrating crap they said about the “dummy who threw his life away for Bush`s war”,never mind the crap this wanna-be said, at his full time job with us, about what THEY did when he was "on patrol" with these creeps, was enough to make me never say another kind word to this wannabe a-hole again.

Quotes from Barney,"You use a taser, because it doesn`t leave marks.", "If you`re really pissed at him, after he`s down and helpless and if there`s no witnesses, you spray him at close rang in the eyes with pepper spray.""If you do use the club, while you`re hitting him you keep saying stop resisting, even if he has stopped." Oh, and the yearly "cop parties, with the stripper/hookers and booze, complete with "unofficial" cop car rides home. The "I got stopped on the way to work for speeding, so I badged`em".And his friends in my unit said that this creep often brought his weapon onto state property, in his vehicle. Now according to DAS, "unless his job required the carrying, as an official part of his current job, or he came onto it in the official capacity of LEO, it is a felony for ANYONE to bring a firearm onto state property in Ohio", but once we tipped our hand on planning to call Investigative Services, to sympathetic rats, that was it, game over. Afterwards, he transfered out to another state agency.

I don`t believe in "officer friendly", they`re people, just as corrupt as anyone else, and often drunk with power, thats from what I`ve heard second hand and seen first hand.

46 posted on 02/18/2011 5:07:06 PM PST by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Immerito

I’ve never been shot in my foxhall crescents before but it sounds pretty painful....


47 posted on 02/18/2011 5:08:24 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

I think cops should have a legal responsibility to retreat off of private property when confronted by an “aggressive” Lab.


48 posted on 02/18/2011 5:09:59 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

You’re not afraid of culpability for the actions of your one of your stormtroopers?

This sort of thing is bad pr for the Galatic Empire, you know.

;-)


49 posted on 02/18/2011 5:12:36 PM PST by Immerito (Reading Through the Bible in 90 Days)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: maine yankee

“Is this (dog killing) becoming some new ‘rite of passage’ for police officers ?”

Short answer: YES. Nowadays, an officer will not be accepted into the blue fraternity till he has canine blood on his hands.


50 posted on 02/18/2011 7:16:27 PM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: katana

” We own a Lab and if somebody shot him I would immediately think of finding a tree and some rope and reenacting the next to last scene in the the book and film Gorky Park, Lee Marvin style”

Let us hope that never becomes necessary. Labs are such loving animals.


51 posted on 02/18/2011 7:19:39 PM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
OK, but that doesn't negate the fact that Labs Bite.

Babies bite, dufus. The point is that if you have a sample of 5000 X Babies versus 1000 Y Babies, it shouldn't surprise you if you have 5 times as many X bites than Y bites.

Ok, so how do we know if the dog in this story wasn't a "mix". Would you agree that what most people call "Labs" are most likely "Lab-mixes", and that true purebred Labs are comparatively rare? Further, if we don't have information regarding how closely the statistic takers adhered to breed definitions, isn't it also true that they could have meticulously adhered to such distinctions?

Again, dufus, where did you learn your statistics? If you are saying X Breed bites more than Y Breed, the burden is on you to prove by statistically valid means that this is so. If you have no idea what criteria your samplers applied, you are dead in the water from the getgo. And for your information, purebred Labs are anything but rare, except perhaps in your trailer park.

Does a "defensive" bite hurt less than an "offensive" bite? Is a person who was maimed or killed by a Lab any less dead if the Lab was only reacting "defensively"?

Of all the drivel you posted, this is perhaps the worst. First, as I said, there is no distinction made between offensive and defensive bites. For all you know, if you know anything, all Lab bites may have been defensive. More to the point, when I see these "cop shoots Lab" stories, the cop is almost always a minority who has never known a dog and wouldn't know the difference between a Lab and a Rottweiler. I would never hesitate to have a loyal dog that protected me or mine. Enjoy your cats.

52 posted on 02/18/2011 7:58:52 PM PST by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: blau993
The fact that you responded with Ad Hominem personal attacks means nothing more than that you concede your position. Nice job!

Babies bite, dufus. The point is that if you have a sample of 5000 X Babies versus 1000 Y Babies, it shouldn't surprise you if you have 5 times as many X bites than Y bites.

The folks on this thread were claiming that Labs are docile innocent creatures who would never harm another living thing. If I can show that one Lab has bitten someone, that negates that argument. So yes, you fail.

Again, dufus, where did you learn your statistics? If you are saying X Breed bites more than Y Breed, the burden is on you to prove by statistically valid means that this is so. If you have no idea what criteria your samplers applied, you are dead in the water from the getgo. And for your information, purebred Labs are anything but rare, except perhaps in your trailer park.

You apparently have a reading comprehension problem. I said "comparatively." Get a dictionary, and look up the meaning.

Of all the drivel you posted, this is perhaps the worst. First, as I said, there is no distinction made between offensive and defensive bites. For all you know, if you know anything, all Lab bites may have been defensive. More to the point, when I see these "cop shoots Lab" stories, the cop is almost always a minority who has never known a dog and wouldn't know the difference between a Lab and a Rottweiler. I would never hesitate to have a loyal dog that protected me or mine. Enjoy your cats.

You failed to answer the questions. Nice try though. I'll ask again... is a person any less dead if they are killed by a "defensive" bite, than by an "offensive" bite?

Remember, in the created order of things, one human life is worth far more than every single dog that exists.

As for your "minority" screed, I find your veiled racism quite telling.

53 posted on 02/18/2011 9:10:23 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

Labs are large dogs, they can be aggressive and quite the handful if in a pissy mood. What I don’t understand is why shoot it? Why not just kick it or shoo it off. It’s just a dog and no matter what kind of dog it is they can be easily dealt with, without a gun.


54 posted on 02/18/2011 9:27:38 PM PST by blarney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Oh, hit a nerve, did I? Sorry, but I don’t suffer fools. Never have, never will.


55 posted on 02/19/2011 6:55:19 AM PST by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I agree, and would do the same.


56 posted on 02/19/2011 7:04:55 AM PST by Emperor Palpatine (Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Another one of the JBT boot-lickers appears.

This happens way to often anymore to give any thug with a badge any benefit of the doubt.


57 posted on 02/19/2011 7:07:50 AM PST by Emperor Palpatine (Tosca, mi fai dimenticare Iddio!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
"Remember, in the created order of things, one human life is worth far more than every single dog that exists. "

"In many jurisdictions the intentional injuring or killing of a police dog is a felony,[1]"

Maybe in your created order, but not in mine, nor under the established law in the US. I can think of at least a few humans who rank lower than my dog.

58 posted on 02/19/2011 8:34:45 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: blau993

I think the reverse is true. You were the one that immediately started projecting, and still are.


59 posted on 02/19/2011 12:47:10 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Emperor Palpatine

“JBT”


60 posted on 02/19/2011 12:47:33 PM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson