I’m a Palin supporter, but you have a point with this.
Palin RT the Tammy Bruce thing a few weeks back. Then she “boycotts” CPAC because of GOProud. Then it turns out that Tammy Bruce is in GOProud.
First she Retweets Tammy Bruce then she boycotts CPAC because of Tammy Bruces organization.
Not consistent.
Sarah Palin explicitly did NOT say she was boycotting CPAC, even when asked about the issue. Further, she said nothing to suggest her lack of attendance was because of GOProud, even though she was asked and given a chance to do so.
While it is possible that she will some day say she skipped CPAC because the organization then-chaired by her good friend Tammy Bruce was there, there is nothing currently in the record to suggest that is the case.
Sarah Palin is quite capable of telling people what she is doing and why. When she skipped CPAC because the leadership was too involved in lobbying, she said so directly. If she was skipping this year because of GOProud, she was perfectly capable of saying so herself.
But once again, her supporters want to put words in her mouth, put motives behind her actions, and in doing so paint a picture of Sarah Palin that could well be the opposite of the truth, in their attempts to shape her into the candidate THEY want.
I say, let Palin be Palin. She can speak for herself, she has the ear of the media, and multiple outlets she can use to talk directly to the people. We don't have to guess what she believes, she'll tell us when she wants to.
Not consistent is your adherence to the truth in your narrative.
The only inconsistency is based upon your own delusion.
Once you have a clearer view of the truth, the contradiction should disappear.
I’m a Palin supporter, but you have a point with this.
Palin RT the Tammy Bruce thing a few weeks back. Then she “boycotts” CPAC because of GOProud. Then it turns out that Tammy Bruce is in GOProud.
First she Retweets Tammy Bruce then she boycotts CPAC because of Tammy Bruces organization.
Not consistent.