Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Looks Like Ross Perot Was Right About The “Giant Sucking Sound”
The Business Insider ^ | 2/11/2011 | Global Economic Intersection

Posted on 02/11/2011 7:50:25 PM PST by FromLori

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: taxtruth
Why do people trust a government that lies 24/7?Are people this GD dumb?

Yes.
At least half of all the 2008 voters were.

...note I did not say citizens...

41 posted on 02/11/2011 10:31:58 PM PST by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

How many were legit???


42 posted on 02/11/2011 10:33:45 PM PST by taxtruth (Don't end the fed,jail the fed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

You guys are ALL clueless! That ‘giant sucking sound to the south’ was Monica Lewinsky!!


43 posted on 02/11/2011 10:40:06 PM PST by LRoggy (Peter's Son's Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Perot is famous (among other things) for his statement during the 1992 presidential campaign that if NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) was not a two way street would create a “giant sucking sound” of jobs going south to the cheap labor markets of Mexico.

Data extracted on: February 12, 2011 (1:36:32 AM)

Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey (National)


Series Id:     CES3000000001
Seasonally Adjusted
Super Sector:  Manufacturing
Industry:      Manufacturing
NAICS Code:    -
Data Type:     ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
1993 16791 16806 16795 16771 16766 16742 16740 16741 16769 16777 16800 16815  
1994 16854 16863 16896 16932 16961 17011 17026 17082 17113 17143 17187 17218  
1995 17261 17265 17262 17278 17259 17249 17218 17239 17246 17215 17207 17229  
1996 17208 17230 17192 17204 17222 17227 17222 17255 17252 17268 17276 17283  
1997 17299 17317 17339 17351 17363 17388 17388 17451 17465 17513 17556 17587  
1998 17623 17627 17637 17635 17623 17609 17421 17563 17557 17511 17465 17447  
1999 17432 17395 17368 17343 17333 17296 17308 17286 17279 17273 17281 17277  
2000 17292 17284 17302 17298 17279 17298 17321 17286 17226 17215 17202 17178  

Poor Ross. LOL!

44 posted on 02/11/2011 10:43:36 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
“So how does selling stuff make in China, help with any of that?”

I don't sell anything made in China.

We make virtually all the component's that go into our equipment. The ones we don't we try to buy from American
made sources.

Perhaps you missed my point.
After were done destroying our manufacturing base
with litigation, taxes, regulations, compliance,
government programs, unions, local officials
with itchy palms, the business either does 1 of
3 things.
1. Goes broke.
2. Gets in bed with the big government protection racket.
2. Moves offshore to escape the madness.

The folks on FR that want the government to fix this problem
by placing tariffs on foreign made goods to correct the
problem don't even understand the problem.

1. Government meddling caused the problem.

2. Tariffs will put more money in the government's coffers
causing more growth of big government. causing more government meddling. (see #1)

3. Tariffs will cause retaliation causing our export levels to drop.

4.Stop allowing the government, lawyers and unions from robbing and killing our private industry.

45 posted on 02/11/2011 11:09:16 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

Didn’t take long for the bush apologist to jump in.


46 posted on 02/11/2011 11:26:45 PM PST by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: One Name

“I voted Perot the first time because of NAFTA. Unions had already priced themselves out of the market in the NE and had a high unemployment rate and Detroit was in decline when RP came along. He’s a Texas businessman, right to work state and all that. Plants were relocating to the south to escape the AFL-CIO poison.”

You may be right, and Perot made his money in Texas (of course) but I just don’t remember him being anti-union, in any way. I do remember the unions lining up with him in opposition to NAFTA.

It would have been interesting with him as prez, that’s for sure, because he definitely wasn’t owned by the unions - like the Dems - so who knows...and he’s gone now.


47 posted on 02/12/2011 4:30:14 AM PST by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Our woes all started with NAFTA IMO.


48 posted on 02/12/2011 5:18:36 AM PST by pallmallman (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

“Perot may have been nutty at times, but it’s been obvious for years that he was exactly right about the giant sucking sound.”

I agree and we all know how the govt. reports unemployment numbers they leave out the millions who have fallen off the roles and they count those who couldn’t find full time jobs like they used to have as fully participating. I see the usual suspects are on claiming jobs are better what a bunch of crap that is.

Persons Not In Labor Force Who Want Job Jumps To All Time High; Real Unemployment Rate At 12.8%

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2668663/posts

U-6 numbers show 16.1% of us are under/unemployed!

http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t15.htm

Why the Real Unemployment Rate Is Around 20% and Rising(cooking the books)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2606272/posts

“So If You Won’t Believe Me On Jobs....

.... how about Richard Fisher?

U.S. nonfarm payrolls fell by 8.75 million jobs from their peak in January 2008 to their trough in February 2010. Estimates are that the population of Americans of working age increased by 4.4 million during the same period, creating a shortfall of over 13 million jobs. Since February 2010, the shortfall has only gotten worse: Although employers have added approximately 1 million new jobs, the working-age population has increased by an additional 1.7 million.”

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=179510

http://www.dallasfed.org/news/speeches/fisher/2011/fs110208.cfm


49 posted on 02/12/2011 5:53:03 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

So If You Won’t Believe Me On Jobs....

.... how about Richard Fisher?

U.S. nonfarm payrolls fell by 8.75 million jobs from their peak in January 2008 to their trough in February 2010. Estimates are that the population of Americans of working age increased by 4.4 million during the same period, creating a shortfall of over 13 million jobs. Since February 2010, the shortfall has only gotten worse: Although employers have added approximately 1 million new jobs, the working-age population has increased by an additional 1.7 million.

Want to argue with me? Have at it. I didn’t make this chart up:

http://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=179510


50 posted on 02/12/2011 5:54:06 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
So If You Won’t Believe Me On Jobs....

Are you Ross Perot?

U.S. nonfarm payrolls fell by 8.75 million jobs from their peak in January 2008 to their trough in February 2010.

2008? What does that have to do with the data I posted from the 1990s?

Want to argue with me?

Just with your silly sources.

I didn’t make this chart up:

I didn't make mine up either.

51 posted on 02/12/2011 6:39:38 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Just correcting all your mistakes as usual at least this time you didn’t out right lie. I thought you’d gone away but I see your right back at it. You would do well to find someone else to try to harass I’m not going to put up with you doing it to me anymore.


52 posted on 02/12/2011 6:42:59 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Liberty Valance

Wow. He’s nicely dressed.


53 posted on 02/12/2011 6:49:02 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

What’s the point of that table?


54 posted on 02/12/2011 7:39:37 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Just correcting all your mistakes

You're funny!

I’m not going to put up with you doing it to me anymore.

If I see you post some error, I'm going to point it out. Sorry if that makes you cry.

55 posted on 02/12/2011 7:50:45 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
Poor Ross said that if NAFTA was ratified, we'd lose jobs so fast, you'd hear a giant sucking sound. That table shows manufacturing jobs from before NAFTA was ratified until 2000.

Here's all jobs.

Data extracted on: February 12, 2011 (10:49:41 AM)

Employment, Hours, and Earnings from the Current Employment Statistics survey (National)


Series Id:     CES0000000001
Seasonally Adjusted
Super Sector:  Total nonfarm
Industry:      Total nonfarm
NAICS Code:    -
Data Type:     ALL EMPLOYEES, THOUSANDS

Download:
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual
1993 109725 109967 109916 110225 110490 110663 110958 111119 111360 111637 111898 112206  
1994 112474 112675 113137 113490 113821 114136 114499 114799 115153 115360 115783 116057  
1995 116378 116587 116809 116971 116955 117186 117265 117536 117781 117928 118076 118207  
1996 118188 118622 118885 119046 119369 119647 119879 120075 120295 120538 120834 121001  
1997 121231 121532 121844 122135 122391 122644 122927 122909 123417 123756 124059 124358  
1998 124628 124817 124961 125238 125639 125851 125970 126322 126540 126733 127017 127359  
1999 127480 127890 127996 128372 128585 128851 129142 129334 129536 129944 130238 130532  
2000 130781 130902 131374 131660 131885 131839 132002 132005 132127 132116 132347 132485  

No sucking sound there either.

56 posted on 02/12/2011 7:55:32 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

What’s to say the numbers wouldn’t have been even higher without NAFTA?


57 posted on 02/12/2011 8:38:42 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: DuncanWaring
What’s to say the numbers wouldn’t have been even higher without NAFTA?

What’s to say the numbers wouldn’t have been lower without NAFTA?

Ross made a prediction, he was wrong.

58 posted on 02/12/2011 8:43:36 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Or maybe he was just ahead of his time - where are those jobs now?

In the last dozen years, the employment rate of the population has gone from about 65% to about 58%.


59 posted on 02/12/2011 9:04:33 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

Right back to your old self a constant harasser. I thought you would stay gone after I proved you to be a liar last time. You really need some serious psychological help.


60 posted on 02/12/2011 9:45:43 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson