Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Looks Like Ross Perot Was Right About The “Giant Sucking Sound”
The Business Insider ^ | 2/11/2011 | Global Economic Intersection

Posted on 02/11/2011 7:50:25 PM PST by FromLori

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last
To: FromLori

The second graph illustrates the problem with the reasoning, though. It shows that we’ve lost more than 28 million jobs. But the total unemployed in the US is only 12.5 million. These kinds of statistics can be misleading.


21 posted on 02/11/2011 8:48:06 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR
...Two term clinton destroyed our manufacturing base...

Well, not just Clinton:

Bill Clinton and his NAFTA Baby Co-Conspirators

"...The Republicans in the House really came through for Clinton by providing 132 Yeas to counter 156 Democratic nays..."

22 posted on 02/11/2011 8:48:24 PM PST by FReepaholic (WTF?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Our unemployed is much larger then 12.5 million they just don’t count the people who dropped off the roles.


23 posted on 02/11/2011 8:55:41 PM PST by FromLori (FromLori">)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The second graph illustrates the problem with the reasoning, though. It shows that we’ve lost more than 28 million jobs. But the total unemployed in the US is only 12.5 million. These kinds of statistics can be misleading.

Not at all misleading. New jobs were created in some industries and some new industries started up during those years.

The 28 million is simply jobs lost as industries moved from the US to cheap labor nations. That 12.5 million unemployed figure is the net of many pluses and minuses in the total job picture.

24 posted on 02/11/2011 9:00:16 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Even if you double it, though, you still don’t get to 28.7 million. They are talking about the job losses that are attributed to this. They don’t take into account the jobs that have been created in other areas.

Imports create jobs here as well as there. We make things here that we could not make but for the stuff that we import from there. We have sales jobs here that exist because of imports. Without oil imports from Mexico and elsewhere, there would be no auto industry in the US, and a much lower standard of living. But for auto parts that we import from overseas, we would probably not be able to make the autos we make here. Same with just about everything we make.

We import things, yes, but we also export things. That’s what trade is all about. We’ve got something they want, they’ve got something we want. If we trade, we are both better off.

Having said that, I would agree that our trade policy is poorly managed by Washington. That’s par for the course. It’s government. But I don’t think you can make a blanket statement that we are worse off because of international trade.

Economists will tell you that the two things that have really contributed to the growth of the US economy since WWII are the growth of technology, and the growth of international trade, not necessarily in that order. But for those two things, we would probably have had no economic growth at all since WWII.


25 posted on 02/11/2011 9:09:13 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The second graph illustrates the problem with the reasoning, though. It shows that we’ve lost more than 28 million jobs. But the total unemployed in the US is only 12.5 million. These kinds of statistics can be misleading.

It's the 12.5 million figure that is misleading. Real unemployment is about 20%, when measured as it was in the previous Great Depression. 20% of 140 million is about 28 million.

The 12.5 million is the number of unemployed still getting benefits or otherwise involved in the Unemployment system on a weekly basis.

26 posted on 02/11/2011 9:09:31 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Sadly, the “Giant sucking sound” is the really the sound of our tax, regulation, and hostile business climate causing business to rush past our borders to places where it is wanted.


27 posted on 02/11/2011 9:10:27 PM PST by The Watcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Gee.

Ya think?


28 posted on 02/11/2011 9:11:49 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Trump 2012 - America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

That’s precisely why it IS misleading.


29 posted on 02/11/2011 9:12:39 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
I remember the infamous Perot/Algore debate on the Larry King Show. One point Algore kept pushing was that Mexico was already a good trading partner, and that we had a $900 million trade surplus with them, on the few nations we had a surplus with.

Of course, as this article states, we now have a $62 billion trade deficit with Mexico after years of the giant sucking sound.

Any fool knew what would happen when they removed tariffs and made cheap Mexican labor (about 10% of US labor cost at the time) available to US firms. Mexico sent out brochures advertising their cheap labor in those days. The lies told to help pass that disaster were, well, they were typical of how all the so-called free trade agreements were misrepresented to the public, and still are.

30 posted on 02/11/2011 9:15:31 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FromLori

Perot may have been nutty at times, but it’s been obvious for years that he was exactly right about the giant sucking sound. And yet, somehow when Gore compared NAFTA to the Louisiana Purchase in a TV debate with Perot, this sounded more serious and thoughtful than Perot’s description.


31 posted on 02/11/2011 9:16:37 PM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
That’s precisely why it IS misleading.

It is not misleading. It is an independently calculated number that covers 28 years, and it has nothing to do with the calculation of current unemployment.

32 posted on 02/11/2011 9:20:46 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
It's not just NAFTA.

I have run a medium sized U.S.manufacturing company for 20 years
and the jobs killer are listed in order:

1. Litigation.
Nothing like having your prototypes drawings and manufacturing
trade secrets stolen and sent to China while you are sued
for antitrust under the Sherman Act by the perpetrators
while the Lawyers milk you for millions.
Even better when you find out you were immune under
Noerr-Pennington doctrine
but the lawyers kept it going just to use your business
for an ATM.

Nothing like juggling 4 discrimination suits while the
state asks you for mountains of paperwork for a year
and a half. And of course the same old determination,
-Never Mind-.

Nothing like having a vendor destroy $35,000 worth of
your parts and sue you for the $2,000 bill.

Nothing like having a vendor not be able to ship your
order, cancel it have them acknowledge the cancellation
buy the parts elsewhere and have the vendor ship them to
you 8 months later.
After the parts are returned the vendor sues you for
them and claims under UCC the parts are custom when they
are not.
After fighting a year in court we decide the litigation
is to costly and decide to buy the $8,000 worth of parts
only to find out the vendor does not have them.

Never lost a single law suit. The lawyers just won bigger.

I could go on all night.
It's the lawyers.
Plus the crooks they work for.

2. Regulations.
Mountains of paperwork, surveys, reporting, environmental surveys, etc.
Every time the government comes up with a new law or program
you just know you and three other people are going
to be busy for a couple of months ( while not doing what you need to do).

Accountants, accountants and more accounts.
A good accountant is worth their weight in gold.
Most want you do all the work and then they kiss
the end product like they were the pope.
Never doing the do-diligence to verify the end product
is correct leaving you to hire another accountant to
correct it.

3.Personnel
A good employee is worth his weight in GOLD.
I have over a hundred of them.
Many have been with the company for 15+ years,
some since it's inception.

How do you tell a good employee?
Simple, they love their job so henceforth they are good
at it. Pay them well and you never find them on the job market.

However due to growth there aways the need for more.
I have learned one thing in 20 years.
A good person almost always has a job.
As for the new hires, 80% of the new hires can't or won't
do their job.
Most within 6 months are either interfering with,
gossiping about, and attacking the good employees (they have special radar and can pick them out in a NY minute).

50% of them turn to grand theft in 1 year less.

Then when terminated they sue the company.
Back to #1.

With all that when does one have the time to actually
do what they are in business for in the first place.

I could write a book.
In fact someday I will.

1. Stop the frivolous lawsuits.
2. Get rid of the ridiculous regulations.
3. Stop taxing business on their inventory's of raw materials and unfinished goods.
Lower the ridiculous tax rates and let the monies be used
for capital equipment and personnel.
4.Stop allowing China to rig their currency so that
Americans cannot compete.
I can take electronic equipment made in China and make
a bill of materials for millions of units and have the parts
and raw material's come to more than the Chinese retail it
for.

That's a free market?

America can win through automation and innovation.

33 posted on 02/11/2011 9:26:53 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveTesla

So how does selling stuff make in China, help with any of that?


34 posted on 02/11/2011 9:28:15 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Trump 2012 - America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Perot barely restrained himself from popping Gore during the King debates.

Gore pulled out his trade balance chart to show a surplus for 1992...and if NAFTA passed and continued we'd have the largest trade surplus with Mexico than any other nation.

We were hitting deficits in ‘95 with no stop in illegal immigration or raise in Mexican standards of living.

35 posted on 02/11/2011 9:30:04 PM PST by endthematrix (The Name of the Game is BAILOUT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

“Two term clinton destroyed our manufacturing base.
By 2000 it was well on it’s way to being gutted”
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Sure. It’s no coincidence that Birl Crinton was the former governor of the state that just happened to be the headquarters of the largest Retailer of Chinese goods in the US.


36 posted on 02/11/2011 9:31:18 PM PST by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NeverForgetBataan

Wasn’t his wife on the Board of Directors?


37 posted on 02/11/2011 9:33:17 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (Palin / Trump 2012 - America First)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

Don’t blame just clinton, cause plenty of Big Government Republicans helped it along.


38 posted on 02/11/2011 9:44:38 PM PST by packrat35 (America is rapidly becoming a police state that East Germany could be proud of!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

In 1994, the Republicans took over both houses of CONgress and you think that they have no blame for this also!

Really! You can’t be serious, if you really DO believe that!


39 posted on 02/11/2011 9:51:23 PM PST by packrat35 (America is rapidly becoming a police state that East Germany could be proud of!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

As a matter of fact she was... You win a cookie.

Read more here:

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0312-01.htm


40 posted on 02/11/2011 9:52:30 PM PST by NeverForgetBataan (To the German Commander: ..........................NUTS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson