Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

150 Years ago today - Jefferson Davis was elected President of the Confederate States of America.
on this day ^ | Feb 9th, 2011 | on-this-day

Posted on 02/09/2011 3:42:15 PM PST by central_va

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-244 next last
To: usmcobra
If the founders of the CSA were so enamored with the US constitution, and states rights why did they have to write entirely different documents for their “nation” and its Sovereign states? Why didn’t they just change one word in it United to Confederate?

Why don't you do the research and answer the question yourself? If you research and post it I will definitely read your thread.

181 posted on 02/11/2011 5:00:42 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Because I already know the answer, I want to hear it from you.


182 posted on 02/11/2011 5:02:24 AM PST by usmcobra (.Islam: providing Live Targets for United States Marines since 1786!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
And states cannot secede unilaterally.

Sure they can.

All they have to do is successfully repel invasion and attempts to occupy and subjugate by the hostiles and they can become a free and separate country.

183 posted on 02/11/2011 5:54:32 AM PST by cowboyway (Molon labe : Deo Vindice : "Rebellion is always an option!!"--Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: cowboyway

none of which the south was able to do....


184 posted on 02/11/2011 6:16:59 AM PST by usmcobra (.Islam: providing Live Targets for United States Marines since 1786!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Sure. Fine with me.


185 posted on 02/11/2011 6:33:03 AM PST by DeoVindiceSicSemperTyrannis (Want to make $$$? It's easy! Use FR to pimp your blog!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I’m the farthest thing from a statist you’ll find. You clearly don’t get what I’m talking about at all. That’s the problem with typing as a means of communication.


186 posted on 02/11/2011 7:30:39 AM PST by Huck (one per-center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Idabilly
That's a short reply? lol. You're worse than me!

Short answer: Madison is nuts. He's like most centrists. They think they can split the baby. Sure, we still have states. Neutered ones.

Of course, even Madison will admit that the House is a people's house, and is elected by the people, not the states. Even he can't escape the fact that his system is at minimum PART national. And in practice, with 200+ years to look at, we know its general tendency is to be a national system.

Federalism, in short, means paying our real master AND a subordinate master. Hell, at this point we'd be better off WITHOUT states!

187 posted on 02/11/2011 7:37:11 AM PST by Huck (one per-center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
That is, you don't see the potential for positive changes in our Constitution in the current environment.

Not exactly. I'll take whatever we can get. There is an amendment process. That seems to be the only avenue available to make the kind of structural changes that are needed. It's also the only way to undo some of the long term damage that has been done by the courts.

I question why you insist on trashing it when you apparently believe there's nothing constructive that can be done to it, today.

"Trashing" is such a loaded term. It's imprecise and unnecessarily emotional. I am analyzing and critiquing the Constitution based on 200 years of data.

Whether you agree with it or not, the 9th and 10th Amendments in particular asserted and reaffirmed what was assumed in the body of the Constitution.

I completely agree with that. Those amendments add no new information on their own. They merely assert or reaffirm principles presumed to be enshrined within the document.

You'll forgive me but I haven't seen what you're suggesting.

I'm suggesting that in the long run, we need something BETTER than the US Constitution and the government it created. But that's a long, long way off. In the meantime, we can play around at the margins, for what it's worth.

188 posted on 02/11/2011 7:52:31 AM PST by Huck (one per-center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
>>What irony that you think men virtuous who held to the belief that one man could own another. If the CSA had won would there still be slavery today?<<

Well, you've proven my point. It is this same progressive / revisionist ignorance that has permeated our schools in an attempt to pervert history.

Oh, by the way, men both North and South held slaves. Was it evil yes, was it primarily a “South thing”....no.

Robert E. Lee.....remember the name? Was a big advocate of educating the negro to bolster their status in society.

After the war, during communion service, Lee joined alongside a black congregate to celebrate the Lord's supper. Shocking to some, but to us in the South, Lee was an honorable man.

My GG grandfathers owned plantations in La.and Tenn. After the war, the blacks did not want to leave. This is where they lived, raised their families and worked.

Oh those evil plantation owners, always a whippin the black man into submission. What a lie. This was the exception to the rule.

The history books of today would not teach our children these lil factoids. Might threaten the revisionist agenda.

You know, the same folks that support homosexual lifestyles as an accepted alternative, no moral absolutes.

Constitution...that old piece of paper!

Uh huh.

189 posted on 02/11/2011 9:04:47 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Idabilly
Thanks Idabilly. You are doing some serious legwork for this thread and I for one truly appreciate your efforts. It takes more time than a lot of folks realize. Your points are invariably on target and present compelling arguments for anyone willing to question their personal beliefs, wherever from.

It's my belief we have the necessary tools within our Constitutional framework to effect a rescue of our republic. It is up to us to clear the cobwebs and redouble our efforts to expose a feral government that has gone off the rails. The only thing lacking is a supply of will to proceed, but we're steadily, if not rapidly, gaining ground as we type. It is also my belief that we don't have a lot of time left to rein in the federales within our Constitutional framework. Two more years of the marxist in the White House and his politburo of apparatchiks may be more than we can recover from before we are only left with Jefferson's remedy of watering the tree of liberty.

Many states as you're aware, who can and will be powerful allies in our rescue efforts have begun to come around. Thanks in no small part I suspect, to an awakening of the people to the excesses of government generally; and more particularly the feral government. May God help us.

190 posted on 02/11/2011 9:18:07 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Huck
There is an amendment process. That seems to be the only avenue available to make the kind of structural changes that are needed. It's also the only way to undo some of the long term damage that has been done by the courts.

What form of amendment(s) would you suggest? Bear in mind it usually takes years, not months, to accomplish. How much time do you think we have? The undocumented marxist in the White House is moving at warp speed. We will either have to catch up or give up. We must find a way to remove this traitor or neuter him or the damage may be irreparable. Do we have the will? He is betting we don't.

191 posted on 02/11/2011 10:06:02 AM PST by ForGod'sSake (You have only two choices: SUBMIT or RESIST with everything you've got!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
Robert E. Lee.....remember the name? Was a big advocate of educating the negro to bolster their status in society.

Then I assume that you won't have any trouble pointing to some evidence to support that claim.

After the war, during communion service, Lee joined alongside a black congregate to celebrate the Lord's supper. Shocking to some, but to us in the South, Lee was an honorable man.

Yeah, about that story. It first appeared in 1905, at the same time that Virginia was instituting Jim Crow laws. Here's the original story from the August, 1905 edition of "Confederate Veteran":

It was communion day; and when the minister was ready to administer the holy communion, a negro in the church arose and advanced to the communion table. He was tall, well-dressed, and black. This was a great surprise and shock to the communicants and others present. Its effect upon the communicants was startling, and for several moments they retained their seats in solemn silence and did not move, being deeply chagrined at this attempt to inaugurate the "new regime" to offend and humiliate them during their most devoted Church services. Dr. Minnegerode [sic] was evidently embarrassed.

General Robert E. Lee was present, and, ignoring the action and presence of the negro, arose in his usual dignified and self-possessed manner, walked up the aisle to the chancel rail, and reverently knelt down to partake of the communion, and not far from the negro. This lofty conception of duty by Gen. Lee under such provoking and irritating circumstances had a magic effect upon the other communicants (including the writer), who went forward to the communion table.

By this action of Gen. Lee the services were conducted as if the negro had not been present. It was a grand exhibition of superiority shown by a true Christian and great soldier under the most trying and offensive circumstances."

The story's not about how racially progressive and tolerant Lee was. It's about how a black man's presence in their church was seen as an "attempt to inaugurate the "new regime" to offend and humiliate them" and how Lee responded to the "provoking and irritating circumstance" of a black man in his church by refusing to acknowledge it. A "kumbaya" moment it ain't.
192 posted on 02/11/2011 10:15:04 AM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

It doesn’t matter. I’m not going to do the tit for tat back and forth thing with a bunch of folks convinced Southern heritage is filled full of hate.

Funny, all the yanks up in the Northeast and liberals out in the West have done so much more to oppress black people.

Didn’t even need a whip, just good ol poverty pimpin legislation.


193 posted on 02/11/2011 11:22:57 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Your concession is noted.


194 posted on 02/11/2011 11:35:42 AM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Uh...ok whatever floats your boat.


195 posted on 02/11/2011 11:45:07 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Uh...ok whatever floats your boat.


196 posted on 02/11/2011 11:45:12 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

Uh...ok whatever floats your boat.


197 posted on 02/11/2011 11:45:29 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777

Aw, now you’re all flustered and posting the same thing three times. It’s okay. I realize that it’s tough when someone rocks your little Lost Cause boat, but accepting that you have a problem is the first step to getting better.


198 posted on 02/11/2011 11:59:35 AM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
In our system, the damage is always irreparable. When the Commerce clause powers expanded throughout the 19th century, were "we" running out of time then? When socialism was on the rise in the 20th century, were we out of time then? Once the national government gets power, it doesn't give it up. When has it ever? Obama is just the latest in a long, long line of national power-expanders. He's nothing new.

As for amendments, it's pointless to talk about. People are too stupid. It's not going to happen.

199 posted on 02/11/2011 12:58:27 PM PST by Huck (one per-center)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Huck

The South shall rise again!

Only next time they rise, they shall do so with the aid of the west and the knowledge of the past guiding their spirit of liberty to a well thought out victory.


200 posted on 02/11/2011 2:55:45 PM PST by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-244 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson