Skip to comments.
IBM Brings Supercomputing Muscle to U.S. Lab
All Things Digital ^
| February 8, 2011 at 7:06 AM PT
| Arik Hesseldahl
Posted on 02/08/2011 12:52:15 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
To: TSgt
A better question would be, "What are they doing with it?"Here were some suggestions for the possile "what"
can you do with 10 or 20 petaflops? Meteorologists could predict local weather down to the 100-meter range with a 20-petaflop system. And running a simulation of how a beating human heart reacts to new medicine, which takes two years of computing time today, will get done in two days on a 10-petaflop system.
Somehow I think we will be doing less productive things.
21
posted on
02/08/2011 1:55:20 PM PST
by
Paul Ross
(Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I am sure the research scientist are lined up to get time on these future machines.
22
posted on
02/08/2011 2:04:54 PM PST
by
Marine_Uncle
(Honor must be earned....Duncan Hunter Sr. for POTUS.)
To: Paul Ross
Can you screen all cell and telephone communications for key words and spit out the non-PC offenders names? ; )
23
posted on
02/08/2011 2:37:48 PM PST
by
jdsteel
(I like the way the words "Palin for President" drive progressives absolutely crazy.)
To: Paul Ross
Could handle an awful lot of pron on a machine like that! :)
24
posted on
02/08/2011 3:53:25 PM PST
by
HeartlandOfAmerica
(Insane, Corrupt Democrats or Stupid, Spinless Republicans - Pick America's poison.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; texas booster; AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; ...
Thanks Ernest!
ps/3 supercomputer site:freerepublic.com
Google
25
posted on
02/08/2011 5:01:03 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
To: theKid51; ourusa
26
posted on
02/08/2011 5:03:41 PM PST
by
bmwcyle
(It is Satan's fault)
To: TSgt; Ernest_at_the_Beach
I second the motion.
Peak teraflop ratings on LINPACK or SCALAPACK or whatever or nice, but if the bulk of your code relies on algorithms that aren't parallelizable, or your data partitioning isn't friendly, you get bit on the ass by Amdahl's Law.
Haven't heard much about robust numerical methods which map to these architectures -- but of course theoretical chemists would just *love* larger basis sets, even with the returns limited by the non-linear scaling.
Cheers!
27
posted on
02/08/2011 7:56:23 PM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Maybe they can set up some solar energy fields just outside of Livermore to power the new computers.
Otherwise they might need a coal powered generating station...
—
Heck yeah,, they have acres of wind turbines nearby at Altamont Pass.. I bet birds would be glad to see them go away..
28
posted on
02/08/2011 8:44:53 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-28 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson