The graph represents, in a timeline from a mere 20,000 years, a flick of dust on a mile-long graph. In the context of a measly five million years (not much geologically speaking), it would be a mere speck on a vast graph ten times wider and millions of miles long.
We are on the earth along for the ride. For all we know, in two years the temperatures in the western U.S. could drop to where they probably were 500 or 600 years ago -- damned cold. Snow. Imagine the havoc that would wreak on food production (California feeds a lot of the U.S.) and human mortality (the entire population of Australia about matches the population density of the lower southern coastal segment of the state).
Climatologists are talking out their arses.
Climatologists are talking out their arses.
I meant the global warming "experts" when I use the word "climatologist." Don't want to offend anyone here who makes a living watching the weather! If "climatologist" means a weatherman, somebody talking about the immediate climate -- the weather -- I thank God for them. Weathermen save lives.
Zipheads are pronouncing trends, monitoring global climate, and making predictions by using info from a graphed moment, a fragment of a sliver of time, from a million-mile ten-foot-high fence.
It doesn't matter if the records go back 30 years or 300 years or 3,000 years. Look it up and see what the sea levels were 20,000 years ago and 150,000 years ago. And then: COMPUTE!