Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: truthfreedom
The MID816 has similar specs to the Galaxy Tab and costs less than $250.

The main reason being the cheap resistive display and small, low-life battery. I'm sure the cheap construction and lack of engineering in the case helped control costs. Good luck getting support too. You get what you pay for.

The Viewsonic G looks pretty good, if you blow away the included OS and falsh your own. So for right now it's a geek toy, not ready for the consumer space.

We recently compared the Motorola XOOM with the original iPad and the XOOM emerged victorious.

In that article they compared the Xoom with the expected iPad 2 specs, and the iPad 2 won. They linked another article comparing the yet-to-be-released Xoom with the year-old iPad, and of course the Xoom won. I do notice battery life, an all-important killer feature in tablets, is absent in the comparisons. Any idea what the Xoom gets? In any case, I don't put much stock in highly speculative hardware mashups.

The Xoom does look like a very good product, but notice the price, right in the iPad's range. You don't get a quality tablet for $250.

19 posted on 02/01/2011 6:38:59 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: antiRepublicrat
You don't get a quality tablet for $250.

$249, Barnes & Noble Nook Color, enjoying my preview of Honeycomb right now, and wow, what a game changer for Android tablets. Can't wait until the full ASOP source release is made by Google. Probably will have the sound issues ironed out before then, though.

Oh, and it's a pretty darn good e-reader too.

21 posted on 02/01/2011 8:35:39 AM PST by kingu (Legislators should read what they write!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson