Posted on 01/29/2011 12:02:19 PM PST by American Dream 246
Mubarak demonstrates the Internet kill switch
President Hosni Mubarak hasnt been able to stop the protesters who took to Egypts streets on Tuesday, so in the ensuing days, hes attempted to stop them from communicating with each other and the outside world.
Several American sitesTwitter, YouTube, Hotmail and Googleas well as the Chinese search engine Baidu were blocked by Mubarak and the Egyptian government on Wednesday, Jan. 26. By Thursday night, Mubarak had shut off Internet access to most of Egypt and disrupted cell phone service. According to tech security blogger James Cowie, the Egyptian government made an unprecedented decision in interrupting Internet access.
The Egyptian government appears to have ordered service providers to shut down all international connections to the Internet, Cowie wrote. Every Egyptian provider, every business, bank, Internet cafe, website, school, embassy, and government office that relied on the big four Egyptian ISPs for their Internet connectivity is now cut off from the rest of the world. Link Egypt, Vodafone/Raya, Telecom Egypt, Etisalat Misr, and all their customers and partners are, for the moment, off the air.
In an eery coincidence, Egypts decision to interrupt Internet service coincides with renewed interest in the U.S. in legislation that would give the federal government an Internet kill switch.
First proposed in June 2010 by independent Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act would give unprecedented emergency powers to the federal government. At a conference last week, Brandon Milhorn, Republican staff director and counsel for the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said that the Senate was revisiting the bill, which would conceivably empower the executive branch to demand that ISPs disable their networks or block access.
According to CNETs Declan McCullagh, The revised version includes new language saying that the federal governments designation of vital Internet or other computer systems shall not be subject to judicial review. Another addition expanded the definition of critical infrastructure to include provider of information technology, and a third authorized the submission of classified reports on security vulnerabilities.
After news of Egypts Internet shutdown spread via Twitter and Facebook, a poster at the social networking site Reddit created a thread with the title, As evidenced by what is happening in Egypt, the only fucking way the President needs an emergency internet kill switch is if the government is doing something really fucking bad.
In remarks delivered Friday afternoon, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton spoke about the unrest in Egypt. We urge the Egyptian authorities to allow peaceful protests and to reverse the unprecedented steps it has taken to cut off communications.
If the net is shut down,,,, thats basically time to overthrow the despot.
Unless they are a Republican.
Hasn’t the Obama administration been suggesting that the president should have power to curtail the internet in times of emergency? I think this is a wonderful example of what can happen if the government gets in control of the internet.......just sayin’
“Unless they are a Republican”
Yeah,, because you can trust them with your rights/
Defeat any and every Senator who co-sponsors, votes for, or does not openly oppose this treasonous bill. Lieberman and Collins must be recalled for proposing it.
Where is this “kill switch”, and how do WE get control of it?
Obama will shut down the internet if anyone ever gets a photo of his scalp and posts it on Twitpic...
Where is the “kill switch?” It’s the ability to tell internet service providers (ISPs) to stop their service on government orders. The solution is to become your own ISP, or to network with a small group that provides its own internet connection service.
This is not about security. In fact, creating a central authority that can “kill” the Internet makes the Internet more INSECURE. Now, someone would have to attack a multitude of distributed nodes operating on a multitude of platforms to “kill” the Internet. If this idiocy is implemented, they would have to attack on centralized location operating on one platform.
So what’s it about? Simple: Control.
“on centralized” should be “one centralized” PIMF
I think the presidential internet “kill switch” talk is pretty much dead and gone in Amercia, Congress, and anywhere else its will ever be mentioned again in DC.
Kill switch = Dictator, it did before the Citizens ever heaard about it, and it certainly is now.
Kill switch = Dictator = ?? “o”, Reid, etc....Its now much more “Obvious” what the Kill switch talk was all about.
Well, before middlemen called ISPs took over the ability to connect, all you’d need was a modem and computer. These days you’d need a server, your own domain, and probably some way to connect directly, becoming your own ISP. Companies do this when they set up their own intranets. I’ll do some research and post a thread with the info when I have it together.
Great! Please can you ping me when you do? Thank you :-)
lol. GOtta give this guy kudos for eloquence ;)
Wish that would fit in a tagline. sigh
Godspeed
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.