To: decimon
700,000 years is 70% of one million.
When talking about 64-67 million years ago, less than a single million is an “error” of less than 1.5%.
Not sure how confident I would have to be about the tolerance range of such numbers before going to publication, but that is just me.
Did make the news though..... rather weak sauce if you ask me.
4 posted on
01/27/2011 11:10:03 AM PST by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: allmendream
6 posted on
01/27/2011 11:15:09 AM PST by
catman67
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
13 posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:46 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
14 posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:58 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
15 posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:58 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
16 posted on
01/27/2011 11:35:58 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
17 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:03 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
18 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
19 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
20 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
21 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
22 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
23 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
24 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST by
Parmy
To: allmendream
I fail to see the importance of this. I am nearly 68 years old. I will probably live into my 80's.
So something that lived 64.5 million years ago just isn't relavant to my survival or really needed in my sphere of relavant knowledge.
25 posted on
01/27/2011 11:36:06 AM PST by
Parmy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson