[Yo-Yo]

Shenanigans perpetrated in the committee room doesn't alter the fact that the full congress voted on the bill.

There is nothing in the Constitution that requires that Roberts Rules be followed in committee in order for a bill to be made into law. It only requires a majority vote in the house and senate, and presidential approval, or a 2/3 vote in both bodies to override a presidential veto.

You can try to argue that if Rangle didn't ramrod the bill through the committee it never would have made it to the house floor, but the Constitution states that each house will make their own rules. If it wasn't overruled at the time, there is nothing that the Supreme Court can do to find the law unconstitutional based on committee behavior.

[BCR #226]

Watch the video... Then you’ll see why there is a problem.

[brityank]

... there is nothing that the Supreme Court can do to find the law unconstitutional based on committee behavior.

Very true; that is also true when the whole House is sitting as a Committee - the House Rules (which the SC could rule on) are not in place for the duration. Once the Committee rises, then the House reverts to the House Rules.