[OddLane]

Wow, a liberal hatchet-job demonizing President Reagan.

And from HBO, of all places!

Color me stunned.

[americanophile]

"it's surprising there's been no feature film about Ronald Reagan in the 30 years since he took office."

...it's only surprising to the Los Angeles Times.

[onyx]

"I came into this film with an ax to grind," he admitted, wryly noting he "didn't tell HBO that."

aN ADMITTED DECEIVER.

PISS ON HIM AND THE JACKASS THAT BOUGHT HIS FILTH.

NOT WATCHING.

[period end of story]

...it's surprising there's been no feature film about Ronald Reagan in the 30 years since he took office.

I'm continually SHOCKED that George Clooney hasn't written, produced and directed a film about Reagan.

I guess he's still hashing it out.

[who_would_fardels_bear]

Now we’ll have one more reason to hate Grover Norquist ... if we needed another.

[central_va]

Didn’t they cancel the Kennedy thing? Hypocrites.

[driftless2]

Both the author of this piece and the filmmaker are dunces. That is one the big reasons why conservatism has been able to make advances in the last thirty years. Because many prominent media libs are so dense. And Zeitchik is surprised that a film has not made about Reagan in the last thirty years...except of course, for the upcoming hatchet job by Zarecki. These people are bleeding obtuse.

[RichInOC]

Like they didn’t have enough opportunity to screw the guy when he was alive, now they’re trying to rape the corpse.

[BfloGuy]

Yeah, but wasn’t it amazing — and heartwarming — to see the national outpouring of affection and respect after his death? The media was stunned.