Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Friend Of the Court is NO FRIEND
17 Jan 2011 | me

Posted on 01/17/2011 11:19:49 AM PST by Moleman

I am wondering if anyone has advice. I lost a very well paying job but thank God landed another one right away. The new one pays less (about 30%)but still pays well. Through my lawyer I petitioned for less alimony / support in August 2010. I have heard NOTHING from FOC. I continue to follow up with my lawyer who goes on to say; well they can take 6 months or so to revise the order. Meanwhile I cannot pay my property taxes as FOC sits on all my money. WTF. Any ideas?


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: corrupt; evil; friendofthecourt

1 posted on 01/17/2011 11:19:53 AM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moleman
Reduction in alimony/support is rare to be granted, and is extremely slow to be granted. Your best bet is to contact your spouse, explain the situation, and work out something with her, perhaps her giving you a rebate back on the money that you can use to pay your taxes.

As far as the court's concerned, if you're eating more than raman for every meal, driving a car, etc, you've obviously got the money to pay this stuff, and you can just keep on paying until they get around to reviewing it.

2 posted on 01/17/2011 11:23:23 AM PST by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

file another petition and keep doing it until you get a hearing
those people are good for nothing ass holes

They dont care if they send you to jail for not paying, even if you CANT pay (lost job, or less paying job)

they dont care if your children starve if you go to jail and can pay nothing


3 posted on 01/17/2011 11:41:40 AM PST by Mr. K ("...but Brondo has what plants crave")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moleman
Moleman,

I was laid off in 2008 and told my ex about it. She went ballistic of course. Then my Father told her about Social Security Disability income that included a lot of stuff that she wanted.

Imagine my surprise when she emailed me saying 'Don't pay any more Alimony'! I managed to get her to notarize a copy of her Email and get her attorney involved. So as long as I am unemployed - No Alimony!

So the Bottom Line is - If you are UNEMPLOYED AGAIN, seek cessation of Alimony then. Regards, SR

4 posted on 01/17/2011 12:17:52 PM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Oh boy is that right. mmmm Ramen noodles.....
Talked to the spouse; she believes FOC are morons too but that I will get something retroactive from them. Therefore, she is not willing to refund me my over payment.
I wonder if going down to the FOC building in person would help.


5 posted on 01/17/2011 12:21:46 PM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

in nj you don’t need a lawyer you can go to probate court and do it there for the cost of fees, but indeed it is hard to do. my hubby was out of work for a year (no income) and then for the last year has been getting and new business going which is improving but hard. so, for two years he has made less than 20 percent of what his alimony is based on and they will not reduce it...do?lt get your hopes up...the courts like indentured servitude and this “private” form of wealth redistribution


6 posted on 01/17/2011 12:21:59 PM PST by hilaryrhymeswithrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
those people are good for nothing ass holes

That is evidently the case!!

7 posted on 01/17/2011 12:22:37 PM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Moleman
Talked to the spouse; she believes FOC are morons too but that I will get something retroactive from them. Therefore, she is not willing to refund me my over payment.

Searching the net for 'FOC Michigan retroactive refund' turned up several results, none of them indicating that the FOC ever hands out refunds, withholds part of support payments to make a possible future refund, etc. A lot of websites came up that explicitly stated that this is never going to be the case, and that such expectations is ignoring what the FOC is mostly about - a third party transferrer of funds. She's already got your overpayment, she's not willing to give it to you, she's certainly not going to be willing to give it to FOC.

It's possible this is just a misunderstanding on her part and your part on how the FOC system works, and my search could be quite incorrect. It would serve you both to speak to your lawyers, and get this clarified, and if possible, simply work out a deal on the side, or better yet, simply opt out of the FOC system and handle it like adults.

8 posted on 01/17/2011 12:36:36 PM PST by kingu (Favorite Sticker: Lost hope, and Obama took my change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Bear in mind that FOC or CSEU as it’s known in many other states have ZERO incentive to grant downward modifications. They get matching fed funds for every dollar collected. They’d rather see you go to prison, accumulating alimony/CS debt and charge you interest and late fees. It’s NOT about the children and if your ex-wife is anything like my hubby’s ex-shrew, she would be pleased to see you in thumb screws on the rack. She takes half his net income every month. He’s been paying this and more for almost eight years now and has at least 14 more to go.

He makes in the low 30s so the state of NY does not care whether or not you can afford to live on your own after you pay CS/Spousal Support.

His ex shrew (who works for Child Protective btw) pocketed over $4,000 over the years in out of pocket orthodonture (which he was never told about) well after the bill was paid through auto payments to CSEU. The magistrate said “water under the bridge” and “oh well, gift to mom.”

She and her new hubby make three times what we do. Good luck because you’re gonna need it.


9 posted on 01/17/2011 12:46:26 PM PST by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Yuck, thats what I was afraid of. NEVER getting a refund.
My lawyer says that they will but now I am concerned.
I would like to opt out but her “friends” have told her not to. ughh


10 posted on 01/17/2011 1:11:19 PM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AbolishCSEU

Sorry to hear that, it has to make you sick. Much the way I feel.


11 posted on 01/17/2011 1:15:40 PM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

Same thing here. We were cutting her a check every week; not good enough for her. She insisted going through CSEU (FOC in Michigan). Her mother, hubby’s ex-MIL, I refer to as “Sasquatch” told her to make sure it goes through CSEU as did her friends.

We get a love letter every year b/c of their bassackward accounting saying we are in arrears; when it’s automatically taken out every week before he gets what’s left of his paycheck.


12 posted on 01/17/2011 1:21:58 PM PST by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

No one pays alimony now days unless they are rich.

Are you rich?


13 posted on 01/17/2011 2:36:41 PM PST by donna (Political Correctness is cultural Marxism - Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna
No one pays alimony now days unless they are rich. Are you rich?

LOL NO!! It's the difference in wage (she was a stay at home mom). Me low six figures, her about 13k. So she is "entitled" to maintain her living standard. grrrrr. Both child support and alimony need reduced. Here I make what is considered a damn good wage and more after taxes and all the support I get about 1/4 of it. Oh boo whoo. But I know God has a plan and I must put my faith in him.

14 posted on 01/17/2011 3:13:17 PM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Moleman

Sorry Dr. Laura et al, but this is a very GOOD reason NEVER to allow your wife to be ‘stay at home.’

I never had that luxury with my two kids; a lot of modern moms EXPECT it nowadays. Daycare is outrageous but the millions, yes MILLIONS over the years you’ll be paying after the divorce is so much more.

Talked to a twenty something liberal co-worker who is allowing his wife to be SAH with their two children... He ACTUALLY THOUGHT that if they broke up HE’D get the children since he’s the breadwinner!!! I “re-educated” him. You should have seen the LOOK on his face!!

Hubby’s ex-shrew was a stay in bed mom; about three years after the breakup she realized she could no longer live off of him (he was paying her his ENTIRE salary out of self imposed (and wrongly placed) guilt. Then her friend got her a “job” at Child Protective.

The archaic family court laws need to change (fathersandfamilies.org)


15 posted on 01/18/2011 1:28:27 AM PST by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AbolishCSEU
Hopefully the re-education of your coworker will sink in and save him thousands of dollars. He actually thought the father or bread winner would be awarded custody from these a holes? LOL.
16 posted on 01/18/2011 6:50:05 AM PST by Moleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kingu

that is terrible advice. it does not change the court order and sets him up for back support penalities and contempt.


17 posted on 01/18/2011 6:53:18 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

And debtor’s prison reserved only for men who are unable to pay their matriarchy, eerrrr I mean CHILD support.


18 posted on 01/19/2011 3:43:31 AM PST by AbolishCSEU (Percentage of Income in CS is inversely proportionate to Mother's parenting of children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson