Several thoughts come to mind.
1. If the 1000 ft law is going to protect Congressmen/women then why shouldn’t the benefits also extend to the average citizen (I support the 2nd Amendment fully, BTW)
2. If we are worried about protecting the most vulnerable to shootings start by asking the following: How many Congress members shot and killed in the last month, year, decade, century. Now how many taxpayers shot in the last month, year, decade, century.
Obviously many MANY more taxpayers at risk so the extra security should be extended to the TAXPAYERS...NOT the already well-protected Congress members.
I think the congress critters are letting their true beliefs slip through.
they are much more valuble than the people they serve.
their constituants are all psychotic killers.
they don’t like to be questioned about heir actions.
has nothing to do with guns or lack thereof.