It sounds like the groom had the right idea.
1 posted on
12/29/2010 1:36:28 PM PST by
Immerito
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: Immerito
44 posted on
12/29/2010 3:02:55 PM PST by
240B
(he is doing everything he said he wouldn't and not doing what he said he would)
To: Immerito
Dominique Buttitta wanted to get married in style, so she spared no expense on her upcoming nuptials: $30,000 to reserve a banquet hall outside Chicago; $11,000 for flowers and spot lighting; $10,000 for an orchestra; $5,000 on her wedding dress and veil. And when he learned about those expenses incurred without his consent, he decided that she could not be trusted with money, so he called the wedding off.
Maybe it is true, maybe not, but unless she can prove otherwise it sounds like a great defense to this non-lawyer.
46 posted on
12/29/2010 3:42:14 PM PST by
TChad
To: Immerito
47 posted on
12/29/2010 4:14:05 PM PST by
iowamark
To: Immerito
Agree. She shouldn’t have bet more than she could lose.
Makes me wonder if she was going into debt to pay for “their” wedding.
To: Immerito
She got the ring.... then proceeded to overspend the collateral value.
The groom is obligated for the value of the ring.....the rest is on her.
58 posted on
12/30/2010 8:15:34 AM PST by
bert
(K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 .....( History is a process, not an event ))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
