Skip to comments.
Runaway groom: Jilted bride sues ex-fiance for $100K
MSNBC ^
| 12/29/2010
| Hugo Kugiya
Posted on 12/29/2010 1:36:24 PM PST by Immerito
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
It sounds like the groom had the right idea.
1
posted on
12/29/2010 1:36:28 PM PST
by
Immerito
To: Immerito
Spending $100K on a wedding?
no wonder he went running
2
posted on
12/29/2010 1:38:45 PM PST
by
Mr. K
('Profiling' you is worse than grabbing your balls)
To: Immerito
This groom should go to court and pay her and thank the Gods he didn't marry her. He could have lost everything, got no sex, and still would have to go to court. This way he just gets the same and be done with...Captainblogspot..nomarriage.
To: Immerito
4
posted on
12/29/2010 1:39:55 PM PST
by
Hoodat
(Yet in all these things we are more than conquerors through Him who loved us. - (Rom 8:37))
To: Immerito
Buttitta it’s a joke right? That name is a beavis and butthead daily double
5
posted on
12/29/2010 1:40:50 PM PST
by
databoss
To: Immerito
I think he was smart to run !
6
posted on
12/29/2010 1:40:55 PM PST
by
CORedneck
To: Immerito
7
posted on
12/29/2010 1:41:38 PM PST
by
A. Morgan
To: Immerito

Dominique, and her Buttittas, are at right.
8
posted on
12/29/2010 1:41:52 PM PST
by
JennysCool
(My hypocrisy goes only so far)
To: Immerito
Did he try to get the engagement ring back?
9
posted on
12/29/2010 1:42:07 PM PST
by
AU72
To: vetvetdoug
that is the purpose of the engagement ring.
he cancels she keeps it.
she cancels he gets it back.
There is no more “breach of promise”.
She seems like a bridzilla.
10
posted on
12/29/2010 1:42:30 PM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Mr. K
$100K that cheap... He might have bought her a house.
He escaped just in time.
Who was it that said “whenever I get the urge to get married I just find a woman I cant stand and buy her a house”.
11
posted on
12/29/2010 1:42:50 PM PST
by
Breto
(never accept the premise)
To: Immerito
12
posted on
12/29/2010 1:44:16 PM PST
by
muawiyah
To: Immerito
Take a look at the pic of Ms. Buttitta with the article. Even if the groom has to pay the $100K for walking, he still got the better end of the bargain.
And one other thing—while I agree in concept that the groom should have to bear a share of the wedding expense for calling it off, I’m sure he didn’t have much say over the $100K price tag. That is way too much for a wedding but I’m sure the bride—like way too many modern brides—demanded that her special day cost a fortune.
To: Immerito
It sounds like the groom had the right idea.
I think you're right. Do you guys remember that crazy eyed woman that took flight before the wedding a few years ago? The one that claimed to have been kidnapped by Mexicans or lesbians or somesuch? I think that idiot man actually ended up marring her.
14
posted on
12/29/2010 1:46:11 PM PST
by
youngidiot
(Shut up)
To: JennysCool

I will reserve judgment pending receipt of the judgment.
15
posted on
12/29/2010 1:46:53 PM PST
by
frithguild
(The Democrat Party Brand - Big Government protecting Entrenched Interests from Competition)
To: JennysCool
some aspects of her are judged “not guilty”
To: Opinionated Blowhard
Yep, I bet he had absolutely no say over the wedding preparation. She is probably one of those crazy control freaks. (based on this and her being a lawyer, lol.)
17
posted on
12/29/2010 1:50:34 PM PST
by
GeronL
(#7 top poster at CC, friend to all, nicest guy ever, +96/-14, ignored by 1 sockpuppet.. oh & BANNED)
To: Immerito
Nearly all states abolished the cause of action “breach of promise to marry” back in the 1930s. Illinois may be an exception, but I doubt it.
To: nascarnation
I wonder what her “old nose” looked like?
19
posted on
12/29/2010 1:51:35 PM PST
by
massgopguy
(I owe everything to George Bailey)
To: Immerito
She “ain’t” bad looking but she looks older than 32.
I recall going out with a female attorney once. I could have easily married her and she became very successful. I did absolutely nothing with her because I was worried I would get sued for something. Failure to “perform” - you name it. It was a major turnoff.
20
posted on
12/29/2010 1:52:59 PM PST
by
Frantzie
(American TV = owned by the Saudis and elites - keep watching & losing your freedom)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson