Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All
More:

****************************************EXCERPT************************************

John of Kent says:

December 28, 2010 at 6:21 am

The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is irrelevant as the whole idea of a greenhouse effect and back radiation from CO2 somehow warming the earth is pure nonsense and goes against the laws of physics and thermodynamics.

You cannot create energy from nothing and heat always moves down hill- i.e. from hot to cold. NEVER the other way round.

http://www.globalwarmingskeptics.info/forums/thread-794-page-1.html

and http://www.ilovemycarbondioxide.com/

4 posted on 12/28/2010 1:51:35 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: All
More:

**************************************EXCERPT******************************************

David L says:

December 28, 2010 at 6:22 am

Excellent post! This pretty much sums it up. I too recognized back in graduate school that academic research is focused on single factors or effects. They probe the basic fundamentals such as the core building blocks of molecules, atoms, and subatomic particles. But once you get a job in industry working with engineers, you quickly learn that the fundamentals are obscured by the complex interactions in a system. Engineers have tools such as DOE that help probe these systems, but the academic is completely unfamiliar with these tools and concepts because interactions are typically not a concern in academic research. The climate is a complex system to the nth degree. Boiling it down to a single factor is beyond wrong and naive.

5 posted on 12/28/2010 1:53:20 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach ( Support Geert Wilders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson