To: taildragger
ROFL
You better save your amatuerish wannabe aerodynamicist to yourself.
Are you sure the fighter dont have sufficient wing area?
ONE PRIMARY DESIGN FEATURE OF THIS CANARD-LAYOUT FIGHTER IS THAT IT HAS WAY LARGER WING AREA COMPARING TO YOUR F-22.
Just deal with it.
To: LiXiangyang
Just deal with it. Wing area is highly overrated at Mach 2.....
19 posted on
12/25/2010 7:56:28 AM PST by
Thermalseeker
(If I print money it's counterfeiting. If the Fed prints money it's quantitative easing?)
To: LiXiangyang
Yes, I am aware of the advantages, I have had ride in Vari Ee Eons ago and sat in on many Rutan lectures at OSH, but even he has tried other Planforms. The Canards have short comings too. But note both the F22 and F35 didn't go Canard, The Grippen did and the Soviet's have 3 planes with their Carrier Birds, my guess is their is a signature penality.
Now if this thing is a double delta and had no horizontal stab ( if the outline is wrong ) and a canard, now we are talking a different beast.
32 posted on
12/25/2010 8:12:43 AM PST by
taildragger
((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: LiXiangyang
Just deal with it.What are you a Troll on the Design Team for this POS?
Decafe baby.
Oh ya Merry Christmas, but I doubt you celebrate it....
39 posted on
12/25/2010 8:16:55 AM PST by
taildragger
((Palin / Mulally 2012 ))
To: LiXiangyang
Just deal with it.Confucius say troll with bad manors soon get zotted!
75 posted on
12/25/2010 10:25:40 AM PST by
dragonblustar
("... and if you disagree with me, then you sir, are worse than Hitler!" - Greg Gutfeld)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson