Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: metesky
Not to be all anal or anything,but I believe the Victorian term for undergarments was “unmentionables.”

But then Queen Victoria smoked pot for menstrual cramps and criminalized only male homosex because she insisted lesbianism was impossible.

3 posted on 12/24/2010 12:01:13 PM PST by Happy Rain ("Every Christmas the Leftist atheists become "hatetheists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Happy Rain

For HRH anyway...


6 posted on 12/24/2010 12:04:42 PM PST by metesky (My retirement fund is holding steady @ $.05 a can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Happy Rain
But then Queen Victoria smoked pot for menstrual cramps...

One of the reasons why libertarians are so hepped up on drug-law repeal is because there were no drug laws when laissez-faire ran high. None.

Regarding opiates, Paul Johnson noted in Birth of the Modern that the typical clientele for liquid opium were middle-class women of a certain age. Incredible as it sounds now, there may have been Woman's Christian Temperence Movement meeting where the party favor was lanaudum.

Bizarre, I know, but it shows how profoundly times have changed. To make the scene even more bizarre, such women would not have been hypcrites by the lights of the time. No social ills accompanied opium use back then, unlike alcohol back then.

Merry Speculative History Day.

31 posted on 12/24/2010 12:59:58 PM PST by danielmryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson