those hwo attempt to argue closed versus open, usually, after, I’ve psoted links showing the fallicy of such arguments, continue arguing for awhile, but eventually just give up, wishing they hadn’t ventured in to the argument because the science simply does not support their arguments- however, they usually don’t give up without first attacking the character of the scientists who refute their claims, or attcking my character first- or both., but htis just goes to show that they really aren’t interested in learnin g science, and are just interested in partisan politics that parade around as science.
>> “ however, they usually don’t give up without first attacking the character of the scientists who refute their claims” <<
.
Standard liberal ‘debating’ tactic.
.