This from the idiot who said...
“Science is based on the assumption that there is no god and that everything that is observed occurred without supernatural intervention.”
????
No, my idiotic FRiend, it is YOU who have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA what science actually is, but you are sure that you hate it because the strawman version you invented is against everything you believe!
“Science is based on the assumption that there is no god and that everything that is observed occurred without supernatural intervention.”
If I am an idiot, why have you not provided evidence in the scientific literature that appeals to supernatural intervention as the explanation for an observation?
"No, my idiotic FRiend, it is YOU who have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA what science actually is, but you are sure that you hate it because the strawman version you invented is against everything you believe!"
Actually I do understand science. There is no reason for you to try to project that I 'hate' science. Science is a wonderful too. What is an abuse of science is those who say that it is 'scientific' to assume that current erosion rates produced the Grand Canyon. That is philosophy, not science.
If my 'strawman' is so wrong, it should be easy for you to provide examples in the scientific literature that appeal to supernatural intervention as the explanation for an observation. Please provide them.
Otherwise, I think we can assume it is simply your usual misrepresentation of science.